Processor comparisons 27-08-2021
Let's say there are difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the full tests Intel Core i9-13900K vs AMD EPYC 7453 and see which is better for games or simple use for programming, video editing, machine learning, streaming, rendering. Here is useful information from different benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, Gears 5, AIDA64, MATLAB, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, Prime95, Handbrake, PCMark 10, 7zip, Dolphin Emulator, WPrime, Geekbench 5.2, VeraCrypt, Furmark, RealBench, Blender, SuperPi, PassMark, 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Overwatch
- DOOM: Eternal
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- Apex Legends
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valorant
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
- Valheim
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Borderlands 3
- Halo Infinite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7453 or Intel Core i9-13900K.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i9-13900K | 90% |
EPYC 7453 | 77% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-13900K is 14% better than EPYC 7453. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i9-13900K | 78% |
EPYC 7453 | 73% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Forza Horizon 4, Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, DOTA 2A, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), NBA 2K20, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, Metro Exodus, Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 138.8 | 129.4 | | Valorant | 157.7 | 147.1 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 88.3 | 82.4 | | Apex Legends | 148.2 | 138.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 118.3 | 110.3 | | Overwatch | 127.7 | 119.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 108.8 | 101.5 | | DOOM Eternal | 78.8 | 73.5 | | Warzone | 123.0 | 114.7 | | Assassin's Creed | 132.4 | 123.6 | | Valheim | 130.9 | 122.1 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i9-13900K | 126% |
EPYC 7453 | 19% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-13900K is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7453 since it has less power consumption: 125W vs. 225W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, video rendering or video editing, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-13900K |
AMD EPYC 7453 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 636 | 147 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 6695 | 6079 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 1061 | 277 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 14885 | 12884 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 3765 | 681 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 42835 | 33504 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900K |
AMD EPYC 7453 | | Single-Core | 3441 | 1434 | | Multi-Core | 73012 | 49146 |
GeekBench 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900K |
AMD EPYC 7453 | | Single-Core | 4733 | 1298 | | Multi-Core | 32841 | 26811 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i9-13900K |
AMD EPYC 7453 | | Announcement date | January 01, 2021 | March 15, 2021 | | Type | Desktop | Server | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | SP3 | | Core name | Raptor Lake-S | Milan | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3 | | Generation | 13 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 MHz | 3.45 MHz | | Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 2.75 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 28 | | Threads | 16 | 56 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 10 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 68000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 125 W | 225 W | | Memory type | DDR5-6500 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 512 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 132 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | | L2 cache | 8 MB | | | L3 cache | 36 MB | 64MB | | Overclocking | yes | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | 100-000000319
100-100000319WOF
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-13900K is 21% better than EPYC 7453 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7453 has 20 more core than Core i9-13900K. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13900K is better: 30
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7453 is better: 7
Although it should be realized that all the number in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i9-13900K and AMD EPYC 7453 before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs EPYC 7663
|
