Processor comparisons 27-08-2021
Perhaps you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Core i9-13900K vs AMD EPYC 7713 and see which is better for games or normal use for streaming, programming, machine learning, video editing, rendering. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or various benchmarks. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like WPrime, PassMark, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, UserBenchmark, RealBench, PCMark 10, Handbrake, Prime95, 7zip, Furmark, SuperPi, Dolphin Emulator, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Geekbench 5.2, Blender, 3DMark, MATLAB, VeraCrypt, Gears 5.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- DOOM: Eternal
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valheim
- Fallout 76
- Last Man Standing
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valorant
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7713 or Intel Core i9-13900K.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i9-13900K | 84% |
EPYC 7713 | 81% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-13900K is 3% better than EPYC 7713. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i9-13900K | 78% |
EPYC 7713 | 99% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Monster Hunter World, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 138.8 | 176.0 | | Valorant | 157.7 | 200.0 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 88.3 | 112.0 | | Apex Legends | 148.2 | 188.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 118.3 | 150.0 | | Overwatch | 127.7 | 162.0 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 108.8 | 138.0 | | DOOM Eternal | 78.8 | 100.0 | | Warzone | 123.0 | 156.0 | | Assassin's Creed | 132.4 | 168.0 | | Valheim | 130.9 | 166.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i9-13900K | 126% |
EPYC 7713 | 20% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-13900K is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7713 as it consumes less power: 125W vs. 225W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-13900K |
AMD EPYC 7713 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 636 | 204 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 6695 | 8435 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 1061 | 391 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 14885 | 18856 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 3765 | 996 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 42835 | 49030 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900K |
AMD EPYC 7713 | | Single-Core | 3441 | 2210 | | Multi-Core | 73012 | 68206 |
GeekBench 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900K |
AMD EPYC 7713 | | Single-Core | 4733 | 1360 | | Multi-Core | 32841 | 56941 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i9-13900K |
AMD EPYC 7713 | | Announcement date | January 01, 2021 | March 15, 2021 | | Type | Desktop | Server | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | SP3 | | Core name | Raptor Lake-S | Milan | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3 | | Generation | 13 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 MHz | 3.675 MHz | | Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 2 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 64 | | Threads | 16 | 128 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 10 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 86000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 125 W | 225 W | | Memory type | DDR5-6500 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 512 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 132 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | | L2 cache | 8 MB | | | L3 cache | 36 MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | yes | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | 100-100000344WOF
100-000000344
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-13900K is 42% better than EPYC 7713 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7713 has 56 more core than Core i9-13900K. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13900K is better: 16
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7713 is better: 21
However, it should be realized that all the number in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i9-13900K and AMD EPYC 7713 before making a choice which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs Core i9-13900K
• Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Vs Core i9-13900K
• Core i9-12900KS Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs EPYC 7713
• Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX Vs EPYC 7713
• Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Core i9-12900KS Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 75F3 Vs EPYC 7713
• Core i9-12950HX Vs EPYC 7713
• Core i9-12900HX Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7663
|
