Processor comparisons 27-08-2021
If you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i9-13900K vs AMD EPYC 7513 tests and see which is better for games or simple use for video editing, programming, streaming, rendering, machine learning. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, MATLAB, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Gears 5, PCMark 10, SuperPi, AIDA64, Blender, Furmark, UserBenchmark, Dolphin Emulator, 3DMark, RealBench, VeraCrypt, Handbrake, Prime95, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 7zip, PassMark, Geekbench 5.2, WPrime.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Death Stranding
- Overwatch
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fortnite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valorant
- Borderlands 3
- Last Man Standing
- Halo Infinite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valheim
- Fallout 76
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7513 or Intel Core i9-13900K.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i9-13900K | 84% |
EPYC 7513 | 75% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-13900K is 10% better than EPYC 7513. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i9-13900K | 78% |
EPYC 7513 | 75% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: DOTA 2A, Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, League of Legends (LOL), Metro Exodus, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 138.8 | 133.5 | | Valorant | 157.7 | 151.7 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 88.3 | 85.0 | | Apex Legends | 148.2 | 142.6 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 118.3 | 113.8 | | Overwatch | 127.7 | 122.9 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 108.8 | 104.7 | | DOOM Eternal | 78.8 | 75.9 | | Warzone | 123.0 | 118.4 | | Assassin's Creed | 132.4 | 127.5 | | Valheim | 130.9 | 125.9 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i9-13900K | 126% |
EPYC 7513 | 23% |
To make a final choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-13900K is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7513 as it consumes less power: 125W vs. 200W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video editing or video rendering, programming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-13900K |
AMD EPYC 7513 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 636 | 162 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 6695 | 6680 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 1061 | 304 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 14885 | 14158 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 3765 | 748 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 42835 | 36818 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900K |
AMD EPYC 7513 | | Single-Core | 3441 | 1576 | | Multi-Core | 73012 | 54007 |
GeekBench 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900K |
AMD EPYC 7513 | | Single-Core | 4733 | 1403 | | Multi-Core | 32841 | 29463 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i9-13900K |
AMD EPYC 7513 | | Announcement date | January 01, 2021 | March 15, 2021 | | Type | Desktop | Server | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | SP3 | | Core name | Raptor Lake-S | Milan | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3 | | Generation | 13 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 MHz | 3.65 MHz | | Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 2.6 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 32 | | Threads | 16 | 64 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 10 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 68000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 125 W | 200 W | | Memory type | DDR5-6500 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 512 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 132 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | | L2 cache | 8 MB | | | L3 cache | 36 MB | 128MB | | Overclocking | yes | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | 100-000000334
100-100000334WOF
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-13900K is 25% better than EPYC 7513 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7513 has 24 more core than Core i9-13900K. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13900K is better: 31
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7513 is better: 6
All the data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i9-13900K and AMD EPYC 7513 before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
|
