AMD EPYC 75F3 vs Intel Xeon W-3175X

Processor comparisons   25-03-2021
   For example you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice by looking at the AMD EPYC 75F3 vs Intel Xeon W-3175X tests and understand which is better for games or normal use for streaming, video editing, rendering, machine learning, programming. Here is useful information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PCMark 10, 7zip, DaVinci Resolve Studio, WPrime, Prime95, AIDA64, MATLAB, Handbrake, VeraCrypt, 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PassMark, SuperPi, RealBench, Gears 5, Furmark, Blender, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, UserBenchmark.
   Gaming performance of processors in:

Fallout 76
Red Dead Redemption 2
Rainbow Six Siege
Apex Legends
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
Cyberpunk 2077
Overwatch
Fortnite
DOOM: Eternal
Watch Dogs Legion
Death Stranding
Valorant
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Halo Infinite
Borderlands 3
Grand Theft Auto V
Valheim
Last Man Standing

After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon W-3175X or AMD EPYC 75F3.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark

EPYC 75F3

70%

Xeon W-3175X

59%

The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 75F3 is 15% better than Xeon W-3175X. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.

EPYC 75F3

81%

Xeon W-3175X

65%

For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Microsoft Flight Simulator, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, DOTA 2A, Control.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite	143.7	116.1
Valorant	163.3	131.9
Cyberpunk 2077	91.4	73.9
Apex Legends	153.5	124.0
Call of Duty Warzone	122.5	98.9
Overwatch	132.3	106.9
Red Dead Redemption 2	112.7	91.0
DOOM Eternal	81.6	66.0
Warzone	127.4	102.9
Assassin's Creed	137.2	110.8
Valheim	135.5	109.5

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.

Power consumption

EPYC 75F3

17%

Xeon W-3175X

17%

Software benchmarks

For example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance

	AMD EPYC 75F3	Intel Xeon W-3175X
Cinbench 15 Single-core	207	188
Cinbench 15 Multi-core	8519	5514
Cinbench 20 Single-core	388	417
Cinbench 20 Multi-core	18057	12975
Cinbench 23 Single-core	955	1112
Cinbench 23 Multi-core	46957	31350

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	AMD EPYC 75F3	Intel Xeon W-3175X
Single-Core	2010	2147
Multi-Core	68880	31909

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	AMD EPYC 75F3	Intel Xeon W-3175X
Single-Core	1484	1351
Multi-Core	54596	27550

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!

	AMD EPYC 75F3	Intel Xeon W-3175X
Announcement date	March 15, 2021	January 01, 2019
Type	Server	Desktop
Socket	SP3	FCLGA3647
Core name	Milan	Skylake
Architecture	Zen 3	x86
Generation	3	2
Turbo Frequency	4 MHz	3.8 MHz
Frequency	2.95 MHz	3.1 MHz
Cores	32	28
Threads	64	56
Bus rate		8 GT/s
Bit	64	64
Lithography	7 nm	14 nm
Transistors count	76000 millions	7510 millions
Power consumption (TDP)	280 W	255 W
Memory type	DDR4	DDR4-2666
Max. Memory		512 Gb
Memory Frequency	3200
Memory bandwidth	204.8 GB/s
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache	256MB	38.5 MB
Overclocking	No	Yes
Supports ECC	No	Yes
Part number	100-000000313 100-100000313WOF

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon W-3175X is 4% better than EPYC 75F3 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 75F3 has 4 more core than Xeon W-3175X. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 75F3 is better: 27
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon W-3175X is better: 10
All the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 75F3 and Intel Xeon W-3175X before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.

AMD EPYC 75F3 - all data

• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 6, 5.2 score

• AMD EPYC 75F3 specs and review.

• Intel Xeon W-3175X specs and review.