AMD EPYC 75F3 vs AMD EPYC 7713

Processor comparisons   25-03-2021
   Perhaps you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the AMD EPYC 75F3 vs AMD EPYC 7713 tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for video editing, programming, machine learning, streaming, rendering. Here you can find useful information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like PassMark, Gears 5, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Furmark, Blender, RealBench, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), MATLAB, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AIDA64, UserBenchmark, PCMark 10, SuperPi, Blender, Prime95, WPrime, Dolphin Emulator, DaVinci Resolve Studio, VeraCrypt, Handbrake, 7zip.
   And how good the processors are in games:

Rainbow Six Siege
Red Dead Redemption 2
Apex Legends
Death Stranding
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Borderlands 3
Grand Theft Auto V
Overwatch
Halo Infinite
Last Man Standing
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
Valorant
Watch Dogs Legion
Fallout 76
Cyberpunk 2077
Valheim
Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
DOOM: Eternal
Fortnite

After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7713 or AMD EPYC 75F3.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark

EPYC 75F3

70%

EPYC 7713

70%

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.

EPYC 75F3

81%

EPYC 7713

83%

The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL).

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite	143.7	146.1
Valorant	163.3	166.0
Cyberpunk 2077	91.4	93.0
Apex Legends	153.5	156.0
Call of Duty Warzone	122.5	124.5
Overwatch	132.3	134.5
Red Dead Redemption 2	112.7	114.5
DOOM Eternal	81.6	83.0
Warzone	127.4	129.5
Assassin's Creed	137.2	139.4
Valheim	135.5	137.8

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.

Power consumption

EPYC 75F3

17%

EPYC 7713

20%

To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7713 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 75F3 as it consumes less power: 280W vs. 225W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

If you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video editing or video rendering, programming, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance

	AMD EPYC 75F3	AMD EPYC 7713
Cinbench 15 Single-core	207	204
Cinbench 15 Multi-core	8519	8435
Cinbench 20 Single-core	388	391
Cinbench 20 Multi-core	18057	18856
Cinbench 23 Single-core	955	996
Cinbench 23 Multi-core	46957	49030

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	AMD EPYC 75F3	AMD EPYC 7713
Single-Core	2010	2210
Multi-Core	68880	68206

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	AMD EPYC 75F3	AMD EPYC 7713
Single-Core	1484	1360
Multi-Core	54596	56941

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!

	AMD EPYC 75F3	AMD EPYC 7713
Announcement date	March 15, 2021	March 15, 2021
Type	Server	Server
Socket	SP3	SP3
Core name	Milan	Milan
Architecture	Zen 3	Zen 3
Generation	3	3
Turbo Frequency	4 MHz	3.675 MHz
Frequency	2.95 MHz	2 MHz
Cores	32	64
Threads	64	128
Bus rate
Bit	64	64
Lithography	7 nm	7 nm
Transistors count	76000 millions	86000 millions
Power consumption (TDP)	280 W	225 W
Memory type	DDR4	DDR4
Max. Memory
Memory Frequency	3200	3200
Memory bandwidth	204.8 GB/s	204.8 GB/s
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache	256MB	256MB
Overclocking	No	No
Supports ECC	No	No
Part number	100-000000313 100-100000313WOF	100-100000344WOF 100-000000344

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 75F3 is 32% better than EPYC 7713 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7713 has 32 more core than EPYC 75F3. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 75F3 is better: 6
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7713 is better: 21
However, it should be realized that all the data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 75F3 and AMD EPYC 7713 before making a decision which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.

AMD EPYC 75F3 - all data

• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 6, 5.2 score

• AMD EPYC 75F3 specs and review.

AMD EPYC 7713 - all data

• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 6, 5.2 score

• AMD EPYC 7713 specs and review.