Processor comparisons 25-03-2021 Perhaps you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice by looking at the AMD EPYC 7543 vs AMD EPYC 75F3 tests and understand which is better for games or simple use for video editing, machine learning, rendering, programming, streaming. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as SuperPi, UserBenchmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Gears 5, MATLAB, Dolphin Emulator, Handbrake, PassMark, Prime95, Furmark, WPrime, AIDA64, 3DMark, RealBench, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Geekbench 5.2, PCMark 10, Blender, 7zip, VeraCrypt, DaVinci Resolve Studio. Gaming performance of processors in: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Apex Legends
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Overwatch
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Watch Dogs Legion
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Grand Theft Auto V
- DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
- Valheim
- Red Dead Redemption 2
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 75F3 or AMD EPYC 7543.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7543 | 75% |
EPYC 75F3 | 82% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 75F3 is 8% better than EPYC 7543. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7543 | 76% |
EPYC 75F3 | 97% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), DOTA 2A, League of Legends (LOL), Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Battlefield V, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 134.8 | 172.4 | Valorant | 153.2 | 195.9 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 85.8 | 109.7 | Apex Legends | 144.0 | 184.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 114.9 | 146.9 | Overwatch | 124.1 | 158.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 105.7 | 135.2 | DOOM Eternal | 76.6 | 97.9 | Warzone | 119.5 | 152.8 | Assassin's Creed | 128.7 | 164.5 | Valheim | 127.2 | 162.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7543 | 20% |
EPYC 75F3 | 17% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7543 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 75F3 since it has less power consumption: 225W vs. 280W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7543 |
AMD EPYC 75F3 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 164 | 207 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 6747 | 8519 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 307 | 388 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 14301 | 18057 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 756 | 955 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 37190 | 46957 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7543 |
AMD EPYC 75F3 | Single-Core | 1592 | 2010 | Multi-Core | 54553 | 68880 |
GeekBench 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7543 |
AMD EPYC 75F3 | Single-Core | 1391 | 1484 | Multi-Core | 30306 | 54596 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7543 |
AMD EPYC 75F3 | Announcement date | March 15, 2021 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | Core name | Milan | Milan | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 3 | Generation | 3 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 4 MHz | Frequency | 2.8 MHz | 2.95 MHz | Cores | 32 | 32 | Threads | 64 | 64 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 68000 millions | 76000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 225 W | 280 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000345 100-100000319WOF
| 100-000000313 100-100000313WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 75F3 is 5% better than EPYC 7543 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7543 is better: 1
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 75F3 is better: 24 Although it should be realized that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7543 and AMD EPYC 75F3 before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming. • Cinebench r15 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r23 score • GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors • Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Core i9-12900K Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7643
• Cinebench r15 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r23 score • GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors • Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7663 • EPYC 7543P Vs EPYC 75F3 • Core i9-12900K Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Core i9-12900H Vs EPYC 75F3
|