Processor comparisons 25-03-2021
Let's say you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 7343 vs AMD EPYC 75F3 and decide which is better for games or simple use for programming, video editing, streaming, machine learning, rendering. Here is useful information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PassMark, MATLAB, Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Furmark, Handbrake, AIDA64, Prime95, 3DMark, Blender, WPrime, VeraCrypt, Gears 5, 7zip, SuperPi, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, RealBench, Geekbench 5.2.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- DOOM: Eternal
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valorant
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Borderlands 3
- Valheim
- Fortnite
- Fallout 76
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Halo Infinite
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Red Dead Redemption 2
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 75F3 or AMD EPYC 7343.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7343 | 72% |
EPYC 75F3 | 88% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 75F3 is 18% better than EPYC 7343. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7343 | 68% |
EPYC 75F3 | 97% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, Forza Horizon 4, Hitman 3, Metro Exodus, Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), Control, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 119.9 | 172.4 | | Valorant | 136.2 | 195.9 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 76.3 | 109.7 | | Apex Legends | 128.1 | 184.1 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 102.2 | 146.9 | | Overwatch | 110.4 | 158.7 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 94.0 | 135.2 | | DOOM Eternal | 68.1 | 97.9 | | Warzone | 106.3 | 152.8 | | Assassin's Creed | 114.4 | 164.5 | | Valheim | 113.1 | 162.6 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7343 | 20% |
EPYC 75F3 | 17% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7343 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 75F3 since it has less power consumption: 190W vs. 280W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, streaming, video rendering or video editing, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7343 |
AMD EPYC 75F3 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 123 | 207 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5045 | 8519 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 229 | 388 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 10693 | 18057 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 565 | 955 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 27805 | 46957 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7343 |
AMD EPYC 75F3 | | Single-Core | 1271 | 2010 | | Multi-Core | 40785 | 68880 |
GeekBench 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7343 |
AMD EPYC 75F3 | | Single-Core | 1178 | 1484 | | Multi-Core | 20638 | 54596 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7343 |
AMD EPYC 75F3 | | Announcement date | March 15, 2021 | March 15, 2021 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | | Core name | Milan | Milan | | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 3 | | Generation | 3 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 4 MHz | | Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 2.95 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 32 | | Threads | 32 | 64 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 54000 millions | 76000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 190 W | 280 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 128MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | 100-000000338
100-100000338WOF
| 100-000000313
100-100000313WOF
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7343 is 7% better than EPYC 75F3 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 75F3 has 16 more core than EPYC 7343. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7343 is better: 2
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 75F3 is better: 26
Although it should be understood that the summary data in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 7343 and AMD EPYC 75F3 before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7663
• EPYC 7543P Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• EPYC 7543 Vs EPYC 75F3
• EPYC 7513 Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7502
|
