|
Intel Core i7-13790F vs Intel Core i9-13900K |
|
Processor comparisons 09-02-2023 Let's say you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i7-13790F vs Intel Core i9-13900K tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for video editing, programming, rendering, machine learning, streaming. Here you can find useful information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, PCMark 10, AIDA64, UserBenchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, MATLAB, VeraCrypt, Prime95, Furmark, 3DMark, Gears 5, SuperPi, Handbrake, Dolphin Emulator, 7zip, RealBench. Gaming performance of processors in: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Fortnite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Halo Infinite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-13900K or Intel Core i7-13790F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i7-13790F | 65% |
Core i9-13900K | 68% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-13900K is 4% better than Core i7-13790F. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i7-13790F | 61% |
Core i9-13900K | 64% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, NBA 2K20, Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), DOTA 2A, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, Ghostrunner, Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Horizon Zero Dawn, Forza Horizon 4.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 108.4 | 114.3 | Valorant | 123.2 | 129.9 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 69.0 | 72.7 | Apex Legends | 115.8 | 122.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 92.4 | 97.4 | Overwatch | 99.8 | 105.2 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 85.0 | 89.6 | DOOM Eternal | 61.6 | 64.9 | Warzone | 96.1 | 101.3 | Assassin's Creed | 103.5 | 109.1 | Valheim | 102.3 | 107.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i7-13790F | 107% |
Core i9-13900K | 66% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-13790F is more energy efficient than the Core i9-13900K since it has less power consumption: 65W vs. 125W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, streaming, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-13790F |
Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 470 | 531 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 4751 | 5603 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 770 | 887 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 10536 | 12458 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2680 | 3150 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 30282 | 35852 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13790F |
Intel Core i9-13900K | Single-Core | 2451 | 2879 | Multi-Core | 51601 | 61110 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13790F |
Intel Core i9-13900K | Single-Core | 2095 | 2502 | Multi-Core | 20045 | 25761 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i7-13790F |
Intel Core i9-13900K | Announcement date | February 07, 2023 | December 13, 2022 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1700 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Raptor Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 13 | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 MHz | 5.8 MHz | Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 4.3 MHz | Cores | 16 | 24 | Threads | 24 | 32 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 16 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 14200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 125 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 6500 | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | L2 cache | 24 MB | 8 MB | L3 cache | 33 MB | 36 MB | Overclocking | No | yes | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | Part number | | Expansion Options
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-13900K is 4% better than Core i7-13790F in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-13900K has 8 more core than Core i7-13790F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-13790F is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13900K is better: 27 However, it should be understood that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i7-13790F and Intel Core i9-13900K before making a decision which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i7-13790F Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i9-13900K Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
| |
|