Intel Xeon Gold 6416H vs AMD EPYC 75F3

Processor comparisons 15-05-2023

   Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice after reading the detailed tests Intel Xeon Gold 6416H vs AMD EPYC 75F3 and decide which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, video editing, rendering, programming, streaming. Here you can find all information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like AIDA64, PassMark, 7zip, RealBench, Dolphin Emulator, WPrime, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, Prime95, UserBenchmark, PCMark 10, Furmark, MATLAB, Gears 5, SuperPi, VeraCrypt.
   Gaming performance of processors in:

Fallout 76
Fortnite
Red Dead Redemption 2
Rainbow Six Siege
Cyberpunk 2077
DOOM: Eternal
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Valheim
Apex Legends
Halo Infinite
Last Man Standing
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
Overwatch
Grand Theft Auto V
Death Stranding
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
Borderlands 3
Valorant
Watch Dogs Legion

After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 75F3 or Intel Xeon Gold 6416H.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark

Xeon Gold 6416H

66%

EPYC 75F3

70%

This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 75F3 is 5% better than Xeon Gold 6416H. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.

Xeon Gold 6416H

68%

EPYC 75F3

81%

For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, Control, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite	120.9	143.7
Valorant	137.4	163.3
Cyberpunk 2077	77.0	91.4
Apex Legends	129.2	153.5
Call of Duty Warzone	103.1	122.5
Overwatch	111.3	132.3
Red Dead Redemption 2	94.8	112.7
DOOM Eternal	68.7	81.6
Warzone	107.2	127.4
Assassin's Creed	115.4	137.2
Valheim	114.1	135.5

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.

Power consumption

Xeon Gold 6416H

27%

EPYC 75F3

17%

To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Xeon Gold 6416H is more energy efficient than the EPYC 75F3 as it consumes less power: 165W vs. 280W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

If you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, streaming, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.

Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance

	Intel Xeon Gold 6416H	AMD EPYC 75F3
Cinbench 15 Single-core	1169	207
Cinbench 15 Multi-core	3758	8519
Cinbench 20 Single-core	2586	388
Cinbench 20 Multi-core	9265	18057
Cinbench 23 Single-core	1802	955
Cinbench 23 Multi-core	52703	46957

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Intel Xeon Gold 6416H	AMD EPYC 75F3
Single-Core	16370	2010
Multi-Core	53648	68880

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Intel Xeon Gold 6416H	AMD EPYC 75F3
Single-Core	1354	1484
Multi-Core	32288	54596

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.

	Intel Xeon Gold 6416H	AMD EPYC 75F3
Announcement date	March 17, 2023	March 15, 2021
Type	Server	Server
Socket	FCLGA4677	SP3
Core name	Sapphire Rapids	Milan
Architecture	x86	Zen 3
Generation	4	3
Turbo Frequency	4.2 MHz	4 MHz
Frequency	2.2 MHz	2.95 MHz
Cores	18	32
Threads	36	64
Bus rate	16 GT/s
Bit	64	64
Lithography	7 nm	7 nm
Transistors count	36000 millions	76000 millions
Power consumption (TDP)	165 W	280 W
Memory type	Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s 1DPC Up to DDR5 4400 MT/s 2DPC	DDR4
Max. Memory	4 Gb
Memory Frequency		3200
Memory bandwidth		204.8 GB/s
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache	45 MB	256MB
Overclocking	No	No
Supports ECC	Yes	No
Part number		100-000000313 100-100000313WOF

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 75F3 is 25% better than Xeon Gold 6416H in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 75F3 has 14 more core than Xeon Gold 6416H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 6416H is better: 13
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 75F3 is better: 22
Although it should be realized that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Xeon Gold 6416H and AMD EPYC 75F3 before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.

Intel Xeon Gold 6416H - all data

• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 6, 5.2 score

• Intel Xeon Gold 6416H specs and review.

AMD EPYC 75F3 - all data

• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 6, 5.2 score

• AMD EPYC 75F3 specs and review.