|
AMD EPYC 7272 vs AMD EPYC 75F3 |
|
Processor comparisons 30-06-2021 For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the AMD EPYC 7272 vs AMD EPYC 75F3 tests and see which is better for games or normal use for video editing, machine learning, rendering, streaming, programming. Here you can find all information from different benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as PassMark, VeraCrypt, RealBench, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 3DMark, WPrime, Handbrake, Blender, PCMark 10, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Dolphin Emulator, Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Furmark, Gears 5, Blender, AIDA64, UserBenchmark, 7zip, SuperPi. Gaming performance of processors in: - Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- Overwatch
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Apex Legends
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Halo Infinite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Fallout 76
- Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valorant
- Last Man Standing
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 75F3 or AMD EPYC 7272.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7272 | 62% |
EPYC 75F3 | 70% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 75F3 is 11% better than EPYC 7272. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7272 | 60% |
EPYC 75F3 | 81% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Battlefield V, Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner, Forza Horizon 4, Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 106.7 | 143.7 | Valorant | 121.3 | 163.3 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 67.9 | 91.4 | Apex Legends | 114.0 | 153.5 | Call of Duty Warzone | 91.0 | 122.5 | Overwatch | 98.2 | 132.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 83.7 | 112.7 | DOOM Eternal | 60.6 | 81.6 | Warzone | 94.6 | 127.4 | Assassin's Creed | 101.9 | 137.2 | Valheim | 100.7 | 135.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7272 | 43% |
EPYC 75F3 | 17% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7272 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 75F3 as it consumes less power: 120W vs. 280W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, streaming, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7272 |
AMD EPYC 75F3 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 395 | 207 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3819 | 8519 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 595 | 388 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 8372 | 18057 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2377 | 955 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 21304 | 46957 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7272 |
AMD EPYC 75F3 | Single-Core | 3257 | 2010 | Multi-Core | 42125 | 68880 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7272 |
AMD EPYC 75F3 | Single-Core | 1569 | 1484 | Multi-Core | 18372 | 54596 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7272 |
AMD EPYC 75F3 | Announcement date | April 01, 2020 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | Core name | Milan | Milan | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 3 | Generation | 3 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 4 MHz | Frequency | 2.9 MHz | 2.95 MHz | Cores | 12 | 32 | Threads | 24 | 64 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 42000 millions | 76000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 120 W | 280 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 64MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000079 100-100000079WOF
| 100-000000313 100-100000313WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 75F3 is 1% better than EPYC 7272 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 75F3 has 20 more core than EPYC 7272. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7272 is better: 7
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 75F3 is better: 24 Although it should be understood that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 7272 and AMD EPYC 75F3 before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7272 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 75F3 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|