|
Intel Core i9-12900H vs AMD EPYC 75F3 |
|
Processor comparisons 08-01-2022 Perhaps you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision after reading the detailed tests Intel Core i9-12900H vs AMD EPYC 75F3 and understand which is better for games or simple use for rendering, video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming. Here you can find all information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like Dolphin Emulator, Prime95, Blender, PCMark 10, VeraCrypt, AIDA64, 7zip, 3DMark, Furmark, RealBench, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), DaVinci Resolve Studio, UserBenchmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, SuperPi, PassMark, Handbrake, WPrime, GeekBench 6, 5.2, MATLAB, Gears 5. And how good the processors are in games: - Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valorant
- Valheim
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Rainbow Six Siege
- DOOM: Eternal
- Death Stranding
- Fallout 76
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
- Halo Infinite
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 75F3 or Intel Core i9-12900H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i9-12900H | 66% |
EPYC 75F3 | 70% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 75F3 is 5% better than Core i9-12900H. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i9-12900H | 57% |
EPYC 75F3 | 81% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, Control, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx, Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Battlefield V, Hitman 3, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 100.8 | 143.7 | Valorant | 114.5 | 163.3 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.1 | 91.4 | Apex Legends | 107.7 | 153.5 | Call of Duty Warzone | 85.9 | 122.5 | Overwatch | 92.8 | 132.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 79.0 | 112.7 | DOOM Eternal | 57.3 | 81.6 | Warzone | 89.3 | 127.4 | Assassin's Creed | 96.2 | 137.2 | Valheim | 95.1 | 135.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i9-12900H | 143% |
EPYC 75F3 | 17% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-12900H is more energy efficient than the EPYC 75F3 since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 280W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-12900H |
AMD EPYC 75F3 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 484 | 207 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5097 | 8519 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 808 | 388 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 11333 | 18057 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2866 | 955 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 32614 | 46957 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-12900H |
AMD EPYC 75F3 | Single-Core | 7469 | 2010 | Multi-Core | 55757 | 68880 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-12900H |
AMD EPYC 75F3 | Single-Core | 1935 | 1484 | Multi-Core | 12544 | 54596 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i9-12900H |
AMD EPYC 75F3 | Announcement date | January 07, 2022 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Laptop | Server | Socket | FCBGA1744 | SP3 | Core name | Alder Lake | Milan | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3 | Generation | 12 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 5 MHz | 4 MHz | Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 2.95 MHz | Cores | 14 | 32 | Threads | 20 | 64 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 76000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 280 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6400 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 108 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 8 MB | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | 100-000000313 100-100000313WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-12900H is 22% better than EPYC 75F3 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 75F3 has 18 more core than Core i9-12900H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-12900H is better: 15
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 75F3 is better: 21 Although it should be realized that all the data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i9-12900H and AMD EPYC 75F3 before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i9-12900H Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Core i7-8650U • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U • Vs Ryzen 3 7335U • Vs Ryzen 7 7730U • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 5 7520U • Vs Ryzen 3 7320U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
AMD EPYC 75F3 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|