Processor comparisons 28-08-2021 If you have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i9-13900K vs AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and see which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, programming, streaming, rendering, video editing. Here you can find all information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like WPrime, SuperPi, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PCMark 10, Furmark, VeraCrypt, RealBench, Prime95, Blender, Geekbench 5.2, 7zip, Handbrake, Gears 5, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB, UserBenchmark, 3DMark, PassMark, AIDA64. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Valorant
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
- Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fortnite
- Halo Infinite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Fallout 76
- Last Man Standing
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 or Intel Core i9-13900K.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
Core i9-13900K | 84% |
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 | 64% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-13900K is 23% better than Ryzen 9 PRO 3900. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i9-13900K | 78% |
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 | 60% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, Ghostrunner, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Hitman 3, Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Control, DOTA 2A, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 138.8 | 105.8 | Valorant | 157.7 | 120.2 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 88.3 | 67.3 | Apex Legends | 148.2 | 113.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 118.3 | 90.1 | Overwatch | 127.7 | 97.4 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 108.8 | 82.9 | DOOM Eternal | 78.8 | 60.1 | Warzone | 123.0 | 93.7 | Assassin's Creed | 132.4 | 101.0 | Valheim | 130.9 | 99.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i9-13900K | 126% |
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 | 64% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-13900K is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 as it consumes less power: 125W vs. 65W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, machine learning, video rendering or video editing, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-13900K |
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 636 | 202 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 6695 | 3007 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 1061 | 499 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 14885 | 6987 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 3765 | 1182 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 42835 | 17436 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900K |
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 | Single-Core | 3441 | 2663 | Multi-Core | 73012 | 31704 |
GeekBench 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13900K |
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 | Single-Core | 4733 | 1252 | Multi-Core | 32841 | 11494 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i9-13900K |
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 | Announcement date | January 01, 2021 | September 30, 2019 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | AM4 | Core name | Raptor Lake-S | Matisse | Architecture | x86 | Zen 2 | Generation | 13 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 MHz | 4.3 MHz | Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 3.1 MHz | Cores | 8 | 12 | Threads | 16 | 24 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 10 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 7800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 125 W | 65 W | Memory type | DDR5-6500 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 512 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 132 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | 768KB | L2 cache | 8 MB | 6MB | L3 cache | 36 MB | 64MB | Overclocking | yes | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | 100-000000072
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-13900K is 11% better than Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 has 4 more core than Core i9-13900K. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13900K is better: 31
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 is better: 6 Although it should be understood that all the figures in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i9-13900K and AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming. • Cinebench r15 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r23 score • GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors • Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Cyberpunk 2077 gaming benchmark • Cinebench r15 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r23 score • GeekBench 5 score • Fortnite gaming benchmark • Roblox gaming benchmark • Valorant gaming benchmark • Apex Legends gaming benchmark • Call of Duty: Warzone gaming benchmark • Overwatch gaming benchmark • Red Dead Redemption 2 gaming benchmark • DOOM Eternal gaming benchmark • Assassin's Creed gaming benchmark • GTA 5 gaming benchmark • PUBG gaming benchmark
Versus Battle of the Processors • EPYC 7713P Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • EPYC 75F3 Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • EPYC 7713 Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • EPYC 7742 Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • EPYC 7663 Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • EPYC 7543P Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • EPYC 7643 Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • EPYC 7543 Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • EPYC 7513 Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • EPYC 7502 Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
|