Processor comparisons 25-03-2021 For example you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice after reading the detailed tests AMD EPYC 75F3 vs AMD EPYC 7763 and understand which is better for games or simple use for programming, streaming, rendering, machine learning, video editing. Here you can find all information from various benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Dolphin Emulator, SuperPi, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, MATLAB, 3DMark, PassMark, WPrime, Blender, Blender, 7zip, Gears 5, VeraCrypt, Prime95, AIDA64, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PCMark 10, Handbrake, Geekbench 5.2, Furmark, UserBenchmark, RealBench. Gaming performance of processors in: - World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Fortnite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valheim
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7763 or AMD EPYC 75F3.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
EPYC 75F3 | 82% |
EPYC 7763 | 82% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 75F3 | 97% |
EPYC 7763 | 68% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4, NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, Control, Half-Life: Alyx, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 172.4 | 121.4 | Valorant | 195.9 | 137.9 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 109.7 | 77.2 | Apex Legends | 184.1 | 129.6 | Call of Duty Warzone | 146.9 | 103.4 | Overwatch | 158.7 | 111.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 135.2 | 95.2 | DOOM Eternal | 97.9 | 69.0 | Warzone | 152.8 | 107.6 | Assassin's Creed | 164.5 | 115.8 | Valheim | 162.6 | 114.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 75F3 | 17% |
EPYC 7763 | 15% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 75F3 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7763 as it consumes less power: 280W vs. 280W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, video rendering or video editing, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 75F3 |
AMD EPYC 7763 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 207 | 210 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 8519 | 8667 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 388 | 414 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 18057 | 21470 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 955 | 970 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 46957 | 47776 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 75F3 |
AMD EPYC 7763 | Single-Core | 2010 | 2446 | Multi-Core | 68880 | 70081 |
GeekBench 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 75F3 |
AMD EPYC 7763 | Single-Core | 1484 | 1303 | Multi-Core | 54596 | 21589 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 75F3 |
AMD EPYC 7763 | Announcement date | March 15, 2021 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | Core name | Milan | Milan | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 3 | Generation | 3 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 3.5 MHz | Frequency | 2.95 MHz | 2.45 MHz | Cores | 32 | 64 | Threads | 64 | 128 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 76000 millions | 86000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 280 W | 280 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000313 100-100000313WOF
| 100-000000312 100-100000312WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 75F3 is 16% better than EPYC 7763 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7763 has 32 more core than EPYC 75F3. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 75F3 is better: 15
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7763 is better: 11 However, it should be understood that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 75F3 and AMD EPYC 7763 before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming. • Cinebench r15 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r23 score • GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors • Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7663 • EPYC 7543P Vs EPYC 75F3 • Core i9-12900K Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Core i9-12900H Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• Cinebench r15 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r23 score • GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors • Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs EPYC 7763 • Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • EPYC 7713 Vs EPYC 7763 • EPYC 7663 Vs EPYC 7763 • EPYC 7543P Vs EPYC 7763 • Core i9-12900K Vs EPYC 7763 • EPYC 7643 Vs EPYC 7763 • Core i9-12900H Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Core i9-12900KF Vs EPYC 7763
|