|
Intel Core i5-13500T vs Intel Core i9-13900K |
|
Processor comparisons 29-01-2023 For example you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i5-13500T vs Intel Core i9-13900K tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, rendering, streaming, programming, video editing. Here you can find useful information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as SuperPi, 3DMark, 7zip, UserBenchmark, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, VeraCrypt, Furmark, AIDA64, WPrime, PCMark 10, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB, GeekBench 6, 5.2, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Prime95, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), RealBench, Gears 5, PassMark, Blender. Gaming performance of processors in: - Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- Valorant
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- Apex Legends
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
- Halo Infinite
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Overwatch
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-13900K or Intel Core i5-13500T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13500T | 60% |
Core i9-13900K | 68% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-13900K is 11% better than Core i5-13500T. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13500T | 58% |
Core i9-13900K | 64% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Hitman 3, Ghostrunner, Horizon Zero Dawn, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Metro Exodus, Control, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 103.5 | 114.3 | Valorant | 117.6 | 129.9 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 65.9 | 72.7 | Apex Legends | 110.6 | 122.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 88.2 | 97.4 | Overwatch | 95.3 | 105.2 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 81.2 | 89.6 | DOOM Eternal | 58.8 | 64.9 | Warzone | 91.8 | 101.3 | Assassin's Creed | 98.8 | 109.1 | Valheim | 97.6 | 107.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13500T | 169% |
Core i9-13900K | 66% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-13500T is more energy efficient than the Core i9-13900K since it has less power consumption: 35W vs. 125W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, video rendering or video editing, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13500T |
Intel Core i9-13900K | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 317 | 531 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3243 | 5603 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 524 | 887 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 7202 | 12458 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1829 | 3150 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 20710 | 35852 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13500T |
Intel Core i9-13900K | Single-Core | 1671 | 2879 | Multi-Core | 35293 | 61110 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13500T |
Intel Core i9-13900K | Single-Core | 1782 | 2502 | Multi-Core | 15214 | 25761 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-13500T |
Intel Core i9-13900K | Announcement date | January 14, 2023 | December 13, 2022 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1700 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Raptor Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 13 | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | 5.8 MHz | Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 4.3 MHz | Cores | 14 | 24 | Threads | 20 | 32 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 16 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 14200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 125 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 6500 | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | L2 cache | 4 MB | 8 MB | L3 cache | 24 MB | 36 MB | Overclocking | No | yes | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | Part number | Expansion Options
| Expansion Options
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-13900K is 25% better than Core i5-13500T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-13900K has 10 more core than Core i5-13500T. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13500T is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13900K is better: 29 However, it should be understood that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i5-13500T and Intel Core i9-13900K before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-13500T Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Intel Core i9-13900K Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
| |
|