|
AMD EPYC 7662 vs AMD EPYC 7713 |
|
Processor comparisons 27-03-2023 Let's say there are difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 7662 vs AMD EPYC 7713 and decide which is better for games or normal use for rendering, streaming, video editing, machine learning, programming. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Furmark, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB, WPrime, Blender, UserBenchmark, PassMark, Handbrake, AIDA64, Prime95, 3DMark, 7zip, RealBench, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Gears 5, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), VeraCrypt, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, PCMark 10. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Rainbow Six Siege
- DOOM: Eternal
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Apex Legends
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Borderlands 3
- Overwatch
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Last Man Standing
- Halo Infinite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valheim
- Death Stranding
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7713 or AMD EPYC 7662.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7662 | 72% |
EPYC 7713 | 70% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7662 is 2% better than EPYC 7713. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7662 | 84% |
EPYC 7713 | 83% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, Control, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 149.3 | 146.1 | Valorant | 169.6 | 166.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 95.0 | 93.0 | Apex Legends | 159.5 | 156.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 127.2 | 124.5 | Overwatch | 137.4 | 134.5 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 117.1 | 114.5 | DOOM Eternal | 84.8 | 83.0 | Warzone | 132.3 | 129.5 | Assassin's Creed | 142.5 | 139.4 | Valheim | 140.8 | 137.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7662 | 16% |
EPYC 7713 | 20% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7713 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7662 since it has less power consumption: 225W vs. 225W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, programming, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7662 |
AMD EPYC 7713 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 204 | 204 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 9116 | 8435 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 523 | 391 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 19338 | 18856 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1006 | 996 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 50318 | 49030 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7662 |
AMD EPYC 7713 | Single-Core | 2880 | 2210 | Multi-Core | 73932 | 68206 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7662 |
AMD EPYC 7713 | Single-Core | 1093 | 1360 | Multi-Core | 60084 | 56941 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7662 |
AMD EPYC 7713 | Announcement date | October 01, 2020 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | Core name | Rome | Milan | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 3 | Generation | 2 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 3.675 MHz | Frequency | 2 MHz | 2 MHz | Cores | 64 | 64 | Threads | 128 | 128 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 86000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 225 W | 225 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 208 GByte/s | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000137 100-000000137WOF | 100-100000344WOF 100-000000344
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7662 is better: 20
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7713 is better: 5 However, it should be understood that all the figures in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 7662 and AMD EPYC 7713 before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7662 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7713 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|