Processor comparisons 25-03-2021
Let's say you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice by looking at the AMD EPYC 7713 vs AMD EPYC 7713P tests and understand which is better for games or normal use for streaming, video editing, programming, rendering, machine learning. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as VeraCrypt, PassMark, 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Gears 5, Geekbench 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, Handbrake, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, AIDA64, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), SuperPi, Prime95, UserBenchmark, Blender, MATLAB, 7zip, WPrime, RealBench.
And how good the processors are in games: - Fallout 76
- Halo Infinite
- Overwatch
- Valorant
- Valheim
- Death Stranding
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Last Man Standing
- Watch Dogs Legion
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- DOOM: Eternal
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Borderlands 3
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7713P or AMD EPYC 7713.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7713 | 88% |
EPYC 7713P | 88% |
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7713 | 99% |
EPYC 7713P | 68% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Microsoft Flight Simulator, Metro Exodus, Control, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, Hitman 3, NBA 2K20, DOTA 2A, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, Ghostrunner, Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL), Half-Life: Alyx.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 176.0 | 120.8 | | Valorant | 200.0 | 137.3 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 112.0 | 76.9 | | Apex Legends | 188.0 | 129.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 150.0 | 103.0 | | Overwatch | 162.0 | 111.2 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 138.0 | 94.7 | | DOOM Eternal | 100.0 | 68.6 | | Warzone | 156.0 | 107.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 168.0 | 115.3 | | Valheim | 166.0 | 113.9 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7713 | 20% |
EPYC 7713P | 18% |
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7713 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7713P since it has less power consumption: 225W vs. 225W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, video editing or video rendering, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7713 |
AMD EPYC 7713P | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 204 | 206 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 8435 | 8520 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 391 | 395 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 18856 | 19046 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 996 | 1006 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 49030 | 49525 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7713 |
AMD EPYC 7713P | | Single-Core | 2210 | 2232 | | Multi-Core | 68206 | 68895 |
GeekBench 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7713 |
AMD EPYC 7713P | | Single-Core | 1360 | 1281 | | Multi-Core | 56941 | 21224 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7713 |
AMD EPYC 7713P | | Announcement date | March 15, 2021 | March 15, 2021 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | | Core name | Milan | Milan | | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 3 | | Generation | 3 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.675 MHz | 3.675 MHz | | Frequency | 2 MHz | 2 MHz | | Cores | 64 | 64 | | Threads | 128 | 128 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 86000 millions | 86000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 225 W | 225 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | 100-100000344WOF
100-000000344
| 100-000000337
100-100000337WOF
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7713 is better: 13
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7713P is better: 8
However, it should be realized that all the figures in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 7713 and AMD EPYC 7713P before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7763
• EPYC 75F3 Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7663
• EPYC 7543P Vs EPYC 7713
• Core i9-12900K Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Core i9-12900H Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• Core i9-12900KF Vs EPYC 7713
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 7763 Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 75F3 Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 7663 Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 7543P Vs EPYC 7713P
• Core i9-12900K Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 7643 Vs EPYC 7713P
• Core i9-12900H Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• Core i9-12900KF Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 7543 Vs EPYC 7713P
|
