AMD EPYC 7713 vs AMD Ryzen 9 3900

Processor comparisons   25-03-2021
   Let's say you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 7713 vs AMD Ryzen 9 3900 and decide which is better for games or normal use for video editing, programming, streaming, rendering, machine learning. Here is useful information from various benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PCMark 10, Blender, 7zip, Prime95, UserBenchmark, WPrime, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, MATLAB, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 3DMark, SuperPi, AIDA64, RealBench, Furmark, Handbrake, Blender, Gears 5, VeraCrypt, Dolphin Emulator.
   Gaming performance of processors in:

Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Grand Theft Auto V
Valheim
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
Last Man Standing
Borderlands 3
Cyberpunk 2077
Rainbow Six Siege
Red Dead Redemption 2
Watch Dogs Legion
Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
DOOM: Eternal
Overwatch
Apex Legends
Death Stranding
Halo Infinite
Valorant
Fallout 76
Fortnite

After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 9 3900 or AMD EPYC 7713.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark

EPYC 7713

70%

Ryzen 9 3900

59%

This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7713 is 15% better than Ryzen 9 3900. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.

EPYC 7713

83%

Ryzen 9 3900

57%

The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, DOTA 2A, Hitman 3, Half-Life: Alyx.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite	146.1	101.6
Valorant	166.0	115.5
Cyberpunk 2077	93.0	64.7
Apex Legends	156.0	108.6
Call of Duty Warzone	124.5	86.6
Overwatch	134.5	93.5
Red Dead Redemption 2	114.5	79.7
DOOM Eternal	83.0	57.7
Warzone	129.5	90.1
Assassin's Creed	139.4	97.0
Valheim	137.8	95.9

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.

Power consumption

EPYC 7713

20%

Ryzen 9 3900

67%

To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 9 3900 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7713 as it consumes less power: 225W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

Let's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, programming, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance

	AMD EPYC 7713	AMD Ryzen 9 3900
Cinbench 15 Single-core	204	196
Cinbench 15 Multi-core	8435	2922
Cinbench 20 Single-core	391	485
Cinbench 20 Multi-core	18856	6789
Cinbench 23 Single-core	996	1149
Cinbench 23 Multi-core	49030	16943

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	AMD EPYC 7713	AMD Ryzen 9 3900
Single-Core	2210	2627
Multi-Core	68206	30807

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	AMD EPYC 7713	AMD Ryzen 9 3900
Single-Core	1360	1324
Multi-Core	56941	13362

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.

	AMD EPYC 7713	AMD Ryzen 9 3900
Announcement date	March 15, 2021	September 30, 2019
Type	Server	Desktop
Socket	SP3	AM4
Core name	Milan	Matisse
Architecture	Zen 3	Zen 2
Generation	3	2
Turbo Frequency	3.675 MHz	4.2 MHz
Frequency	2 MHz	3.1 MHz
Cores	64	12
Threads	128	24
Bus rate
Bit	64	64
Lithography	7 nm	7 nm
Transistors count	86000 millions	7800 millions
Power consumption (TDP)	225 W	65 W
Memory type	DDR4	DDR4
Max. Memory
Memory Frequency	3200	3200
Memory bandwidth	204.8 GB/s
L1 cache		768KB
L2 cache		6MB
L3 cache	256MB	64MB
Overclocking	No	No
Supports ECC	No	No
Part number	100-100000344WOF 100-000000344	100-000000072

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 9 3900 is 35% better than EPYC 7713 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7713 has 52 more core than Ryzen 9 3900. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7713 is better: 24
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 9 3900 is better: 9
However, it should be understood that all the data in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 7713 and AMD Ryzen 9 3900 before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.

AMD EPYC 7713 - all data

• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 6, 5.2 score

• AMD EPYC 7713 specs and review.

• AMD Ryzen 9 3900 specs and review.