Processor comparisons 25-03-2021 Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 7313P vs AMD EPYC 7713 and see which is better for games or normal use for programming, video editing, machine learning, rendering, streaming. Here is useful information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like RealBench, PCMark 10, VeraCrypt, MATLAB, Gears 5, WPrime, Prime95, Blender, UserBenchmark, Furmark, AIDA64, Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Geekbench 5.2, PassMark, Dolphin Emulator, 7zip, SuperPi, 3DMark. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
- Apex Legends
- Grand Theft Auto V
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- Halo Infinite
- Overwatch
- Borderlands 3
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fallout 76
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valorant
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Fortnite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7713 or AMD EPYC 7313P.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7313P | 67% |
EPYC 7713 | 81% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7713 is 17% better than EPYC 7313P. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7313P | 67% |
EPYC 7713 | 99% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, Control, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 118.0 | 176.0 | Valorant | 134.1 | 200.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 75.1 | 112.0 | Apex Legends | 126.0 | 188.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 100.6 | 150.0 | Overwatch | 108.6 | 162.0 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 92.5 | 138.0 | DOOM Eternal | 67.0 | 100.0 | Warzone | 104.6 | 156.0 | Assassin's Creed | 112.6 | 168.0 | Valheim | 111.3 | 166.0 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7313P | 23% |
EPYC 7713 | 20% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7313P is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7713 since it has less power consumption: 155W vs. 225W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7313P |
AMD EPYC 7713 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 116 | 204 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 4742 | 8435 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 215 | 391 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 10051 | 18856 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 531 | 996 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 26137 | 49030 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7313P |
AMD EPYC 7713 | Single-Core | 1195 | 2210 | Multi-Core | 38338 | 68206 |
GeekBench 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7313P |
AMD EPYC 7713 | Single-Core | 1107 | 1360 | Multi-Core | 19400 | 56941 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7313P |
AMD EPYC 7713 | Announcement date | March 15, 2021 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | Core name | Milan | Milan | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 3 | Generation | 3 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 3.675 MHz | Frequency | 3 MHz | 2 MHz | Cores | 16 | 64 | Threads | 32 | 128 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 54000 millions | 86000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 155 W | 225 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 128MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000339 100-100000339WOF
| 100-100000344WOF 100-000000344
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7313P is 33% better than EPYC 7713 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7713 has 48 more core than EPYC 7313P. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7313P is better: 3
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7713 is better: 25 However, it should be realized that all the data in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 7313P and AMD EPYC 7713 before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not. • Cinebench r15 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r23 score • GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Core i9-12900K Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7643
• Cinebench r15 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r23 score • GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors • Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • EPYC 75F3 Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7663 • EPYC 7543P Vs EPYC 7713 • Core i9-12900K Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Core i9-12900H Vs EPYC 7713
|