|
AMD EPYC 7H12 vs AMD EPYC 7713 |
|
Processor comparisons 27-03-2023 If you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the AMD EPYC 7H12 vs AMD EPYC 7713 tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for programming, rendering, video editing, machine learning, streaming. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as Prime95, Blender, UserBenchmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, AIDA64, 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark, VeraCrypt, Blender, Gears 5, SuperPi, 7zip, WPrime, MATLAB, PCMark 10, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, PassMark, Handbrake, RealBench. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Valheim
- Overwatch
- Apex Legends
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Rainbow Six Siege
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- DOOM: Eternal
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Last Man Standing
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Death Stranding
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7713 or AMD EPYC 7H12.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7H12 | 79% |
EPYC 7713 | 70% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7H12 is 11% better than EPYC 7713. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7H12 | 85% |
EPYC 7713 | 83% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Forza Horizon 4, Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, DOTA 2A, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), NBA 2K20, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, Metro Exodus, Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 150.5 | 146.1 | Valorant | 171.1 | 166.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 95.8 | 93.0 | Apex Legends | 160.8 | 156.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 128.3 | 124.5 | Overwatch | 138.6 | 134.5 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 118.0 | 114.5 | DOOM Eternal | 85.5 | 83.0 | Warzone | 133.4 | 129.5 | Assassin's Creed | 143.7 | 139.4 | Valheim | 142.0 | 137.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7H12 | 12% |
EPYC 7713 | 20% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7713 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7H12 as it consumes less power: 280W vs. 225W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7H12 |
AMD EPYC 7713 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 293 | 204 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 12207 | 8435 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 580 | 391 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 30243 | 18856 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1365 | 996 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 67301 | 49030 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7H12 |
AMD EPYC 7713 | Single-Core | 3442 | 2210 | Multi-Core | 98726 | 68206 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7H12 |
AMD EPYC 7713 | Single-Core | 1025 | 1360 | Multi-Core | 61304 | 56941 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7H12 |
AMD EPYC 7713 | Announcement date | April 01, 2019 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | Core name | Rome | Milan | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 3 | Generation | 2 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 3.675 MHz | Frequency | 2.6 MHz | 2 MHz | Cores | 64 | 64 | Threads | 128 | 128 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 86000 millions | 86000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 280 W | 225 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GByte/s | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000055 100-000000055WOF
| 100-100000344WOF 100-000000344
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7H12 is 23% better than EPYC 7713 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7H12 is better: 22
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7713 is better: 5 Although it should be understood that the summary data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7H12 and AMD EPYC 7713 before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7H12 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7713 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|