Processor comparisons 25-03-2021
Let's say you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision after reading the detailed tests AMD EPYC 7343 vs AMD EPYC 7713 and decide which is better for games or simple use for programming, video editing, machine learning, rendering, streaming. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, SuperPi, AIDA64, Furmark, Blender, RealBench, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, MATLAB, VeraCrypt, Handbrake, 7zip, Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5, PassMark, UserBenchmark, Prime95, Geekbench 5.2, 3DMark, PCMark 10, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- DOOM: Eternal
- Death Stranding
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- Halo Infinite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valheim
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Borderlands 3
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7713 or AMD EPYC 7343.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7343 | 72% |
EPYC 7713 | 88% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7713 is 18% better than EPYC 7343. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7343 | 68% |
EPYC 7713 | 99% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Control, Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, NBA 2K20, Monster Hunter World, Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 119.9 | 176.0 | | Valorant | 136.2 | 200.0 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 76.3 | 112.0 | | Apex Legends | 128.1 | 188.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 102.2 | 150.0 | | Overwatch | 110.4 | 162.0 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 94.0 | 138.0 | | DOOM Eternal | 68.1 | 100.0 | | Warzone | 106.3 | 156.0 | | Assassin's Creed | 114.4 | 168.0 | | Valheim | 113.1 | 166.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7343 | 20% |
EPYC 7713 | 20% |
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video rendering or video editing, programming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7343 |
AMD EPYC 7713 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 123 | 204 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5045 | 8435 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 229 | 391 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 10693 | 18856 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 565 | 996 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 27805 | 49030 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7343 |
AMD EPYC 7713 | | Single-Core | 1271 | 2210 | | Multi-Core | 40785 | 68206 |
GeekBench 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7343 |
AMD EPYC 7713 | | Single-Core | 1178 | 1360 | | Multi-Core | 20638 | 56941 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7343 |
AMD EPYC 7713 | | Announcement date | March 15, 2021 | March 15, 2021 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | | Core name | Milan | Milan | | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 3 | | Generation | 3 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 3.675 MHz | | Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 2 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 64 | | Threads | 32 | 128 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 54000 millions | 86000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 190 W | 225 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 128MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | 100-000000338
100-100000338WOF
| 100-100000344WOF
100-000000344
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7343 is 37% better than EPYC 7713 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7713 has 48 more core than EPYC 7343. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7343 is better: 3
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7713 is better: 25
Although it should be understood that all the data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7343 and AMD EPYC 7713 before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 75F3 Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7663
• EPYC 7543P Vs EPYC 7713
• Core i9-12900K Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Core i9-12900H Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
|
