Processor comparisons 10-01-2022
For example you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice after reading the detailed tests Intel Core i9-12900TE vs AMD EPYC 7713 and decide which is better for games or simple use for streaming, rendering, video editing, machine learning, programming. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as Geekbench 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, 3DMark, WPrime, 7zip, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, VeraCrypt, MATLAB, SuperPi, PCMark 10, RealBench, Handbrake, Blender, Prime95, PassMark, Furmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, Gears 5, AIDA64.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Halo Infinite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Last Man Standing
- Death Stranding
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Fallout 76
- Borderlands 3
- Valheim
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Fortnite
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7713 or Intel Core i9-12900TE.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i9-12900TE | 73% |
EPYC 7713 | 81% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7713 is 9% better than Core i9-12900TE. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i9-12900TE | 63% |
EPYC 7713 | 99% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Monster Hunter World, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, League of Legends (LOL), Control, Metro Exodus, DOTA 2A, NBA 2K20, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 112.0 | 176.0 | | Valorant | 127.3 | 200.0 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 71.3 | 112.0 | | Apex Legends | 119.7 | 188.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 95.5 | 150.0 | | Overwatch | 103.1 | 162.0 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 87.8 | 138.0 | | DOOM Eternal | 63.7 | 100.0 | | Warzone | 99.3 | 156.0 | | Assassin's Creed | 106.9 | 168.0 | | Valheim | 105.7 | 166.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i9-12900TE | 174% |
EPYC 7713 | 20% |
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-12900TE is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7713 as it consumes less power: 35W vs. 225W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, video rendering or video editing, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-12900TE |
AMD EPYC 7713 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 432 | 204 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 4547 | 8435 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 721 | 391 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 10110 | 18856 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2556 | 996 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 29091 | 49030 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-12900TE |
AMD EPYC 7713 | | Single-Core | 6663 | 2210 | | Multi-Core | 49735 | 68206 |
GeekBench 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-12900TE |
AMD EPYC 7713 | | Single-Core | 1829 | 1360 | | Multi-Core | 15550 | 56941 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i9-12900TE |
AMD EPYC 7713 | | Announcement date | July 21, 2021 | March 15, 2021 | | Type | Embedded | Server | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | SP3 | | Core name | Alder Lake | Milan | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3 | | Generation | 12 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 MHz | 3.675 MHz | | Frequency | 3.6 MHz | 2 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 64 | | Threads | 24 | 128 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 12600 millions | 86000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 225 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | 6400 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | | L2 cache | 14 MB | | | L3 cache | 30 MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | 100-100000344WOF
100-000000344
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-12900TE is 44% better than EPYC 7713 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7713 has 48 more core than Core i9-12900TE. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-12900TE is better: 17
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7713 is better: 19
The summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i9-12900TE and AMD EPYC 7713 before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs Core i9-12900TE
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors
• Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 75F3 Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7663
• EPYC 7543P Vs EPYC 7713
• Core i9-12900K Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Core i9-12900H Vs EPYC 7713
|
