Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
AMD EPYC 7713 vs Intel Xeon W-3175X gaming benchmark

AMD EPYC 7713 vs Intel Xeon W-3175X

Processor comparisons   25-03-2021
   Let's say you have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 7713 vs Intel Xeon W-3175X and understand which is better for games or simple use for video editing, programming, streaming, machine learning, rendering. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like VeraCrypt, Blender, 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), SuperPi, Furmark, WPrime, 7zip, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PassMark, Geekbench 5.2, PCMark 10, Dolphin Emulator, UserBenchmark, Handbrake, MATLAB, Gears 5, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Prime95, AIDA64, RealBench, Blender.
   And how good the processors are in games:
  • Overwatch
  • Watch Dogs Legion
  • DOOM: Eternal
  • Valheim
  • Halo Infinite
  • Borderlands 3
  • World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
  • Grand Theft Auto V
  • Fortnite
  • Apex Legends
  • Red Dead Redemption 2
  • Valorant
  • Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
  • Fallout 76
  • Cyberpunk 2077
  • Death Stranding
  • Last Man Standing
  • Rainbow Six Siege
  • Assassin's Creed Valhalla

   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon W-3175X or AMD EPYC 7713.

 
AMD EPYC 7713
Intel Xeon W-3175X

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors

Processor Benchmark
EPYC 771388% Xeon W-3175X67%
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7713 is 23% better than Xeon W-3175X. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.
EPYC 771399% Xeon W-3175X74%
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, Control, Hitman 3, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, Microsoft Flight Simulator.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite176.0130.6
Valorant200.0148.4
Cyberpunk 2077112.083.1
Apex Legends188.0139.5
Call of Duty Warzone150.0111.3
Overwatch162.0120.2
Red Dead Redemption 2138.0102.4
DOOM Eternal100.074.2
Warzone156.0115.7
Assassin's Creed168.0124.6
Valheim166.0123.2
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.


Power consumption
EPYC 771320% Xeon W-3175X17%
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7713 is more energy efficient than the Xeon W-3175X as it consumes less power: 225W vs. 255W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.


Software benchmarks

If you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, streaming, video rendering or video editing, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance
AMD EPYC 7713 Intel Xeon W-3175X
Cinbench 15 Single-core204188
Cinbench 15 Multi-core84355514
Cinbench 20 Single-core391417
Cinbench 20 Multi-core1885612975
Cinbench 23 Single-core9961112
Cinbench 23 Multi-core4903031350

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
AMD EPYC 7713 Intel Xeon W-3175X
Single-Core22102147
Multi-Core6820631909

GeekBench 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
AMD EPYC 7713 Intel Xeon W-3175X
Single-Core13601351
Multi-Core5694127550

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!

AMD EPYC 7713 Intel Xeon W-3175X
Announcement dateMarch 15, 2021January 01, 2019
TypeServerDesktop
SocketSP3FCLGA3647
Core nameMilanSkylake
ArchitectureZen 3x86
Generation32
Turbo Frequency3.675 MHz3.8 MHz
Frequency2 MHz3.1 MHz
Cores6428
Threads12856
Bus rate8 GT/s
Bit6464
Lithography14 nm
Transistors count86000 millions7510 millions
Power consumption (TDP)225 W255 W
Memory typeDDR4DDR4-2666
Max. Memory512 Gb
Memory Frequency3200
Memory bandwidth204.8 GB/s
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache256MB38.5 MB
OverclockingNoYes
Supports ECCNoYes
Part number100-100000344WOF
100-000000344
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon W-3175X is 35% better than EPYC 7713 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7713 has 36 more core than Xeon W-3175X. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7713 is better: 28
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon W-3175X is better: 9
   However, it should be understood that all the number in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 7713 and Intel Xeon W-3175X before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 5 score


Versus Battle of the Processors
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• EPYC 75F3 Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7663
• EPYC 7543P Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• EPYC 7543 Vs EPYC 7713
• EPYC 7513 Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7502

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 5 score
• Fortnite gaming benchmark
• Roblox gaming benchmark
• Valorant gaming benchmark
• Cyberpunk 2077 gaming benchmark
• Apex Legends gaming benchmark
• Call of Duty: Warzone gaming benchmark
• Overwatch gaming benchmark
• Red Dead Redemption 2 gaming benchmark
• DOOM Eternal gaming benchmark
• Assassin's Creed gaming benchmark
• GTA 5 gaming benchmark
• PUBG gaming benchmark


Versus Battle of the Processors
• EPYC 7763 Vs Xeon W-3175X
• EPYC 7713P Vs Xeon W-3175X
• EPYC 75F3 Vs Xeon W-3175X
• EPYC 7742 Vs Xeon W-3175X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• EPYC 7663 Vs Xeon W-3175X
• EPYC 7543P Vs Xeon W-3175X
• EPYC 7643 Vs Xeon W-3175X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• EPYC 7543 Vs Xeon W-3175X
• EPYC 7513 Vs Xeon W-3175X
Categories
 • Comparisons
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 5
 • Antutu 8
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands
Last added

Core i9-11900H vs Ryzen 7 5800X..
Core i9-11950H vs Ryzen Threadri..
Core i9-11950H vs Core i9-9940X..
Core i9-11900H vs Core i7-11700K..
Core i9-10900E vs Ryzen 7 PRO 47..
Core i9-10900E vs Ryzen 5 5600H..
Core i9-10900E vs Ryzen 7 Extrem..
Core i9-10900TE vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4..
Core i9-11900H vs Ryzen 9 5980HS..
Core i9-11900KB vs Core i9-11900..
Core i9-11980HK vs Core i9-7980X..
Intel Core i9-11900KB Cinebench r23
Core i9-11950H vs Xeon Gold 6248..
Intel Core i9-10900E Cinebench r15
Core i9-10900E vs Core i5-11500T..
Core i9-11980HK vs Ryzen 9 5900..
Core i9-11900H vs Ryzen Threadri..
Core i9-11900KB vs Core i9-11900..
Intel Core i9-11950H GeekBench 5
Core i9-11980HK vs Core i7-11700..
Core i9-10900E vs Core i7-9800X..
Core i9-10900TE vs Xeon E5-2697R..
Core i9-11900KB vs Xeon W-2275..
Intel Core i9-11900KB GeekBench 5
Core i9-11950H vs Ryzen Threadri..
Intel Core i9-10900E GeekBench 5
Core i9-11950H vs Core i9-11900F..
Intel Core i9-11900H Cinebench r20
Core i9-10900E vs Ryzen 7 2700..
Core i9-11900H vs Ryzen 7 5700G..
Core i9-11900H vs Core i9-11900F..
Core i9-11900KB vs Core i9-10920..
Core i9-11900KB vs Core i9-10980..
Core i9-11950H vs Ryzen 7 5800X..
Core i9-11950H vs Ryzen Threadri..
Core i9-10900TE vs Core i7-10700..
Core i9-10900TE vs Ryzen 5 4600H..
Core i9-10900E vs Core i9-10885H..
Core i9-11950H vs Ryzen 7 Pro 58..
Core i9-10900TE vs Core i9-10885..