AMD EPYC 9274F vs AMD EPYC 7713

Processor comparisons   11-03-2023
   Perhaps you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision after reading the full tests AMD EPYC 9274F vs AMD EPYC 7713 and understand which is better for games or normal use for streaming, rendering, video editing, machine learning, programming. Here you can find useful information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as Prime95, AIDA64, PassMark, MATLAB, 7zip, Blender, SuperPi, RealBench, UserBenchmark, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark, Handbrake, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Gears 5, 3DMark, Dolphin Emulator, VeraCrypt, DaVinci Resolve Studio, WPrime, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark.
   Gaming performance of processors in:

Fortnite
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
Rainbow Six Siege
Borderlands 3
Valheim
Valorant
Red Dead Redemption 2
Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
Death Stranding
Last Man Standing
Cyberpunk 2077
Fallout 76
Overwatch
Grand Theft Auto V
Watch Dogs Legion
Apex Legends
Halo Infinite
DOOM: Eternal

After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7713 or AMD EPYC 9274F.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark

EPYC 9274F

69%

EPYC 7713

70%

The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7713 is 1% better than EPYC 9274F. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.

EPYC 9274F

73%

EPYC 7713

83%

For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, Half-Life: Alyx, League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Horizon Zero Dawn, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Forza Horizon 4, Monster Hunter World, Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite	129.7	146.1
Valorant	147.4	166.0
Cyberpunk 2077	82.5	93.0
Apex Legends	138.5	156.0
Call of Duty Warzone	110.5	124.5
Overwatch	119.4	134.5
Red Dead Redemption 2	101.7	114.5
DOOM Eternal	73.7	83.0
Warzone	114.9	129.5
Assassin's Creed	123.8	139.4
Valheim	122.3	137.8

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.

Power consumption

EPYC 9274F

21%

EPYC 7713

20%

To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9274F is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7713 as it consumes less power: 320W vs. 225W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

For example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, streaming, video rendering or video editing, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance

	AMD EPYC 9274F	AMD EPYC 7713
Cinbench 15 Single-core	154	204
Cinbench 15 Multi-core	7827	8435
Cinbench 20 Single-core	321	391
Cinbench 20 Multi-core	16627	18856
Cinbench 23 Single-core	846	996
Cinbench 23 Multi-core	43295	49030

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	AMD EPYC 9274F	AMD EPYC 7713
Single-Core	1946	2210
Multi-Core	63524	68206

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	AMD EPYC 9274F	AMD EPYC 7713
Single-Core	2073	1360
Multi-Core	40852	56941

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!

	AMD EPYC 9274F	AMD EPYC 7713
Announcement date	November 10, 2022	March 15, 2021
Type	Server	Server
Socket	SP5	SP3
Core name	Genoa	Milan
Architecture	Zen 4	Zen 3
Generation	4	3
Turbo Frequency	4.3 MHz	3.675 MHz
Frequency	4.05 MHz	2 MHz
Cores	24	64
Threads	48	128
Bus rate
Bit	64	64
Lithography	5 nm	7 nm
Transistors count	64000 millions	86000 millions
Power consumption (TDP)	320 W	225 W
Memory type	DDR5	DDR4
Max. Memory	4096 Gb
Memory Frequency	4800	3200
Memory bandwidth	460.8 GB/s	204.8 GB/s
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache	256MB	256MB
Overclocking	No	No
Supports ECC	Yes	No
Part number	100-000000794 100-000000794WOF	100-100000344WOF 100-000000344

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9274F is 50% better than EPYC 7713 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7713 has 40 more core than EPYC 9274F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9274F is better: 10
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7713 is better: 24
Although it should be understood that the summary data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 9274F and AMD EPYC 7713 before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.

AMD EPYC 9274F - all data

• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 6, 5.2 score

• AMD EPYC 9274F specs and review.

AMD EPYC 7713 - all data

• Cinebench r15 score
• Cinebench r20 score
• Cinebench r23 score
• GeekBench 6, 5.2 score

• AMD EPYC 7713 specs and review.