|
AMD EPYC 9274F vs AMD EPYC 7713 |
|
Processor comparisons 11-03-2023 Perhaps you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision after reading the full tests AMD EPYC 9274F vs AMD EPYC 7713 and understand which is better for games or normal use for streaming, rendering, video editing, machine learning, programming. Here you can find useful information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as Prime95, AIDA64, PassMark, MATLAB, 7zip, Blender, SuperPi, RealBench, UserBenchmark, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark, Handbrake, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Gears 5, 3DMark, Dolphin Emulator, VeraCrypt, DaVinci Resolve Studio, WPrime, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark. Gaming performance of processors in: - Fortnite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Borderlands 3
- Valheim
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- Overwatch
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Apex Legends
- Halo Infinite
- DOOM: Eternal
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7713 or AMD EPYC 9274F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 9274F | 69% |
EPYC 7713 | 70% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7713 is 1% better than EPYC 9274F. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 9274F | 73% |
EPYC 7713 | 83% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, Half-Life: Alyx, League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Horizon Zero Dawn, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Forza Horizon 4, Monster Hunter World, Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 129.7 | 146.1 | Valorant | 147.4 | 166.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 82.5 | 93.0 | Apex Legends | 138.5 | 156.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 110.5 | 124.5 | Overwatch | 119.4 | 134.5 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 101.7 | 114.5 | DOOM Eternal | 73.7 | 83.0 | Warzone | 114.9 | 129.5 | Assassin's Creed | 123.8 | 139.4 | Valheim | 122.3 | 137.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 9274F | 21% |
EPYC 7713 | 20% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9274F is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7713 as it consumes less power: 320W vs. 225W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, streaming, video rendering or video editing, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9274F |
AMD EPYC 7713 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 154 | 204 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 7827 | 8435 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 321 | 391 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 16627 | 18856 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 846 | 996 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 43295 | 49030 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9274F |
AMD EPYC 7713 | Single-Core | 1946 | 2210 | Multi-Core | 63524 | 68206 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9274F |
AMD EPYC 7713 | Single-Core | 2073 | 1360 | Multi-Core | 40852 | 56941 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 9274F |
AMD EPYC 7713 | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP5 | SP3 | Core name | Genoa | Milan | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 3 | Generation | 4 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 4.3 MHz | 3.675 MHz | Frequency | 4.05 MHz | 2 MHz | Cores | 24 | 64 | Threads | 48 | 128 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 86000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 320 W | 225 W | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | 100-000000794 100-000000794WOF | 100-100000344WOF 100-000000344
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9274F is 50% better than EPYC 7713 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7713 has 40 more core than EPYC 9274F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9274F is better: 10
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7713 is better: 24 Although it should be understood that the summary data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 9274F and AMD EPYC 7713 before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 9274F Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7713 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|