Processor comparisons 25-03-2021 For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the detailed tests AMD EPYC 7713 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6242R and see which is better for games or normal use for programming, machine learning, streaming, rendering, video editing. Here you can find useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, PCMark 10, VeraCrypt, WPrime, Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5, RealBench, Furmark, MATLAB, PassMark, AIDA64, Handbrake, Blender, SuperPi, Geekbench 5.2, Prime95, UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 7zip, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Apex Legends
- Last Man Standing
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valheim
- DOOM: Eternal
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Halo Infinite
- Death Stranding
- Overwatch
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valorant
- Fallout 76
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Grand Theft Auto V
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon Gold 6242R or AMD EPYC 7713.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7713 | 81% |
Xeon Gold 6242R | 66% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7713 is 18% better than Xeon Gold 6242R. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7713 | 99% |
Xeon Gold 6242R | 75% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Microsoft Flight Simulator, League of Legends (LOL), NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Metro Exodus, Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 176.0 | 133.1 | Valorant | 200.0 | 151.2 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 112.0 | 84.7 | Apex Legends | 188.0 | 142.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 150.0 | 113.4 | Overwatch | 162.0 | 122.5 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 138.0 | 104.3 | DOOM Eternal | 100.0 | 75.6 | Warzone | 156.0 | 117.9 | Assassin's Creed | 168.0 | 127.0 | Valheim | 166.0 | 125.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7713 | 20% |
Xeon Gold 6242R | 17% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7713 is more energy efficient than the Xeon Gold 6242R since it has less power consumption: 225W vs. 205W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, streaming, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7713 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6242R | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 204 | 216 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 8435 | 5946 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 391 | 497 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 18856 | 14382 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 996 | 1269 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 49030 | 36754 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7713 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6242R | Single-Core | 2210 | 2419 | Multi-Core | 68206 | 34882 |
GeekBench 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7713 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6242R | Single-Core | 1360 | 1073 | Multi-Core | 56941 | 29161 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7713 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6242R | Announcement date | March 15, 2021 | October 01, 2020 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP3 | FCLGA3647 | Core name | Milan | Cascade Lake | Architecture | Zen 3 | x86 | Generation | 3 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 3.675 MHz | 4.1 MHz | Frequency | 2 MHz | 3.1 MHz | Cores | 64 | 20 | Threads | 128 | 40 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 86000 millions | 7510 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 225 W | 205 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | | 1 Gb | Memory Frequency | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 35.75 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | Yes | Part number | 100-100000344WOF 100-000000344
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Xeon Gold 6242R is 35% better than EPYC 7713 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7713 has 44 more core than Xeon Gold 6242R. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7713 is better: 25
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon Gold 6242R is better: 11 Although it should be understood that all the figures in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7713 and Intel Xeon Gold 6242R before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming. • Cinebench r15 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r23 score • GeekBench 5 score
Versus Battle of the Processors • Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Core i9-13900K Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • EPYC 75F3 Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7663 • EPYC 7543P Vs EPYC 7713 • Core i9-12900K Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Core i9-12900H Vs EPYC 7713
• Fortnite gaming benchmark • Cinebench r15 score • Cinebench r20 score • Cinebench r23 score • GeekBench 5 score • Roblox gaming benchmark • Valorant gaming benchmark • Cyberpunk 2077 gaming benchmark • Apex Legends gaming benchmark • Call of Duty: Warzone gaming benchmark • Overwatch gaming benchmark • Red Dead Redemption 2 gaming benchmark • DOOM Eternal gaming benchmark • Assassin's Creed gaming benchmark • GTA 5 gaming benchmark • PUBG gaming benchmark
Versus Battle of the Processors • EPYC 7763 Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • EPYC 7713P Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • EPYC 75F3 Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • EPYC 7742 Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • EPYC 7663 Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • EPYC 7543P Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Core i9-12900K Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • EPYC 7643 Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Core i9-12900HK Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
|