Qualcomm QCS6490 vs Samsung Exynos 2000

Comparisons 18-02-2023

Comprehensive comparison data of Qualcomm QCS6490 vs Samsung Exynos 2000, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Geekbench, AnTuTu, PCMark, Quadrant, Vellamo, GFXBench, Neocore, PassMark, 3DMark, and how good the chipsets are in games GTA, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, PUBG, Fortnite, Madout2 etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to understand which chipset is better to buy QCS6490 or Exynos 2000.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

QCS6490

42%

Exynos 2000

46%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

QCS6490

81%

Exynos 2000

79%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

QCS6490

40%

Exynos 2000

43%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	QCS6490	Exynos 2000
Total score	592145	645405
CPU	165802	180721
GPU	225011	245243
MEM	94749	103264
UX	106579	116171

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	QCS6490	Exynos 2000
Single-Core	920	1268
Multi-Core	3344	4045

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	QCS6490	Exynos 2000
Frequency	2700 MHz	2900 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	6 nm	5 nm
Transistors count	5200 millions
Core configuration	1x2.7 GHz Kryo 670 Gold Plus 3x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 Gold 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 670 Silver	2x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1 2x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	9 W
Memory type	LPDDR5	LPDDR5
Max. Memory	16 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	3200	2133
Memory bandwidth	16	44
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	512 KB	192 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	2 MB	2 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.3-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 2000 is 6% better than QCS6490 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Adreno 643L	Mali-G78 MP10
GPU Frequency	812 MHz	700 MHz
GFloPS	1573	854
# of Cores		24
# of Shader Units	576
Display	2520 x 1080 pixels	4096 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	26.4	29.5
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	67.5	72.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	92.6	100.5
Call of Duty: Mobile	51.5	56.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	57.8	62.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	84.9	91.1
Real Racing 3	115.8	175.9
Sniper 3D	148.5	160.8
Need for Speed No Limits	129.7	140.7
Mortal Kombat X	120.8	130.7
CSR Racing 2	120.9	140.7

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	192 MP	240 MP
Dual Camera resolution	36 MP	48 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)	Qualcomm Spectra 570L
Video Encoding FPS	60	120
Video Encoding resolution	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	HDR10+, HDR10, HLG, H.264 (AVC), H.265 (HEVC), VP8, VP9	H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Modem QCM6490 5G	Exynos Modem 5200
Download speed	3700 MBit/s.	14000 MBit/s.
Upload speed	1600 MBit/s.	12000 MBit/s.
Navigation	NavIC enabled, GBeidou, GLONASS, GPS, QZSS, Galileo	Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, SBAS, NaVIC
NFC support	Yes	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm QCS6490 is better: 10
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2000 is better: 29
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs, as well as read the test results at the links below.

QCS6490 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• QCS6490 specs and review.

Exynos 2000 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 2000 specs and review.