Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Samsung Exynos 2000 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 benchmark which processor is better

Samsung Exynos 2000 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Full data of speed tests and benchmarks Samsung Exynos 2000 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800, compare of GPUs Mali-G57 MP4 and Mali-G78 MP10.

   This performance comparison involves two processors: Exynos 2000 is octa-core (Cortex-X1) and Dimensity 800 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A76). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.

   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as AnTuTu, Mozilla Kraken, Vellamo, Neocore, PCMark, Octane V2, 3DMark, WebXPRT 3, PassMark, Geekbench 5, Quadrant, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, Mortal Kombat, PUBG, Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc.

   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which SoCs is better to buy Exynos 2000 or Dimensity 800 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, Asphalt 9.

 
Samsung Exynos 2000
MediaTek Dimensity 800

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors

CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Exynos 200097% Dimensity 80068%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Exynos 200093% Dimensity 80072%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Exynos 200090% Dimensity 80066%

Antutu 8

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Exynos 2000 Dimensity 800
Total score645405339816
CPU194979110206
GPU27316594592
MEM10607171802
UX9854962662

GeekBench 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Exynos 2000 Dimensity 800
Single-Core1268761
Multi-Core40452588

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Exynos 2000 Dimensity 800
Frequency2900 MHz2000 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography5 nm7 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration2x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1
2x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A76
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)9 W10 W
Memory typeLPDDR5LPDDR4x
Max. Memory16 Gb16 Gb
Memory Frequency21332133
Memory bandwidth4417.07
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache192 KB
L2 cache1 MB
L3 cache2 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8.2-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 2000 is 31% better than Dimensity 800 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-G78 MP10Mali-G57 MP4
GPU Frequency700 MHz600 MHz
GFloPS854498
# of Cores244
# of Shader Units
Display4096 x 2160 pixels2520 x 1080 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile29.525.2
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)72.856.6
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra100.546.2
Call of Duty: Mobile56.142.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)62.446.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition91.172.2
Real Racing 3175.969.3
Sniper 3D160.8101.6
Need for Speed No Limits140.773.9
Mortal Kombat X130.767
CSR Racing 2140.764.7
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution240 MP64 MP
Dual Camera resolution48 MP32 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS120240
Video Encoding resolution8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9H.264, H.265/HEVC


Networks and Navigation
ModemExynos Modem 52005G Multi-Mode
Download speed14000 MBit/s.4700 MBit/s.
Upload speed12000 MBit/s.2500 MBit/s.
NavigationBeidou, QZSS, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, SBAS, NaVICGPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2000 is better: 37
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 800 is better: 1
   You need to know that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile


CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2100

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile


CPU Versus Battle
• Snapdragon 875 Vs Dimensity 800
• Apple A12Z Bionic Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
• HiSilicon Kirin 9000 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
• HiSilicon Kirin 9000E Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
• Samsung Exynos 1080 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
• Apple A12X Bionic Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
• Samsung Exynos 2100 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
• MediaTek Dimensity 1200 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
Categories
 • Comparisons
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 5
 • Antutu 8
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands
Last added

Core i9-11900H vs Ryzen 7 5800X..
Core i9-11950H vs Ryzen Threadri..
Core i9-11950H vs Core i9-9940X..
Core i9-11900H vs Core i7-11700K..
Core i9-10900E vs Ryzen 7 PRO 47..
Core i9-10900E vs Ryzen 5 5600H..
Core i9-10900E vs Ryzen 7 Extrem..
Core i9-10900TE vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4..
Core i9-11900H vs Ryzen 9 5980HS..
Core i9-11900KB vs Core i9-11900..
Core i9-11980HK vs Core i9-7980X..
Intel Core i9-11900KB Cinebench r23
Core i9-11950H vs Xeon Gold 6248..
Intel Core i9-10900E Cinebench r15
Core i9-10900E vs Core i5-11500T..
Core i9-11980HK vs Ryzen 9 5900..
Core i9-11900H vs Ryzen Threadri..
Core i9-11900KB vs Core i9-11900..
Intel Core i9-11950H GeekBench 5
Core i9-11980HK vs Core i7-11700..
Core i9-10900E vs Core i7-9800X..
Core i9-10900TE vs Xeon E5-2697R..
Core i9-11900KB vs Xeon W-2275..
Intel Core i9-11900KB GeekBench 5
Core i9-11950H vs Ryzen Threadri..
Intel Core i9-10900E GeekBench 5
Core i9-11950H vs Core i9-11900F..
Intel Core i9-11900H Cinebench r20
Core i9-10900E vs Ryzen 7 2700..
Core i9-11900H vs Ryzen 7 5700G..
Core i9-11900H vs Core i9-11900F..
Core i9-11900KB vs Core i9-10920..
Core i9-11900KB vs Core i9-10980..
Core i9-11950H vs Ryzen 7 5800X..
Core i9-11950H vs Ryzen Threadri..
Core i9-10900TE vs Core i7-10700..
Core i9-10900TE vs Ryzen 5 4600H..
Core i9-10900E vs Core i9-10885H..
Core i9-11950H vs Ryzen 7 Pro 58..
Core i9-10900TE vs Core i9-10885..