Comparisons 11-03-2021
So, which processor or chip is better? Full data of benchmarks and speed tests Samsung Exynos 2000 vs Apple A12Z Bionic, compare of GPUs Apple A12Z Bionic and Mali-G78 MP10.
This performance comparison includes two processors: Exynos 2000 is octa-core (Cortex-X1) and A12Z Bionic is octa-core (Vortex). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications like PCMark, Geekbench, WebXPRT 3, GFXBench, Mozilla Kraken, Vellamo, Octane V2, Neocore, Quadrant, PassMark, 3DMark, AnTuTu 8, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Call of Duty: Mobile, PUBG, Fortnite, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat etc.
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processors is better to buy Exynos 2000 or A12Z Bionic and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Madout2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Exynos 2000 | 97% |
A12Z Bionic | 99% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Exynos 2000 | 93% |
A12Z Bionic | 99% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Exynos 2000 | 90% |
A12Z Bionic | 95% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Exynos 2000 |
A12Z Bionic | | Total score | 645405 | 729707 | | CPU | 194979 | 179367 | | GPU | 273165 | 371998 | | MEM | 106071 | 95242 | | UX | 98549 | 75217 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Exynos 2000 |
A12Z Bionic | | Single-Core | 1268 | 1332 | | Multi-Core | 4045 | 4661 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Exynos 2000 |
A12Z Bionic | | Frequency | 2900 MHz | 2490 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | | 10000 millions | | Core configuration | 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1
2x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 4x2.49GHz Vortex
4x1.6 GHz Tempest | | Power consumption (TDP) | 9 W | 6 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 2133 | | Memory bandwidth | 44 | 42 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 192 KB | 48 KB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | 4 MB | | L3 cache | 2 MB | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.4-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 2000 is 14% better than A12Z Bionic in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G78 MP10 | Apple A12Z Bionic | | GPU Frequency | 700 MHz | 2500 MHz | | GFloPS | 854 | 1486 | | # of Cores | 24 | 8 | | # of Shader Units | | | | Display | 4096 x 2160 pixels | 2732 x 2048 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | 29.5 | 28.8 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 72.8 | 86.5 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 100.5 | 52.4 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | 56.1 | 48.4 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 62.4 | 74.9 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 91.1 | 107.7 | | Real Racing 3 | 175.9 | 104.8 | | Sniper 3D | 160.8 | 115.3 | | Need for Speed No Limits | 140.7 | 62.9 | | Mortal Kombat X | 130.7 | 83.8 | | CSR Racing 2 | 140.7 | 68.1 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 240 MP | 12 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 48 MP | 12 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Apple ISP | | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 960 | | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9 | Dolby Vision, H.265 (HEVC), HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, H.264 (AVC), VP8, VP9 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Exynos Modem 5200 | Intel XMM 7560 LTE | | Download speed | 14000 MBit/s. | 1000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 12000 MBit/s. | 350 MBit/s. | | Navigation | Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, SBAS, NaVIC | Beidou, GPS, GLONASS, Galileo | | NFC support | No | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2000 is better: 23
The number of parameters for which Apple A12Z Bionic is better: 17
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Snapdragon 875 Vs A12Z Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
|
