MediaTek Kompanio 900T vs Samsung Exynos 2000

Comparisons 03-12-2021

Detailed compare data of MediaTek Kompanio 900T vs Samsung Exynos 2000, examination of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as GFXBench, Neocore, 3DMark, PCMark, Geekbench, AnTuTu, Quadrant, Vellamo, PassMark, and how good the chips are in games Asphalt 9, Madout2, Fortnite, Call of Duty, Minecraft, PUBG, GTA etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy MediaTek Kompanio 900T or Exynos 2000.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Kompanio 900T

35%

Exynos 2000

46%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Kompanio 900T

77%

Exynos 2000

79%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Kompanio 900T

33%

Exynos 2000

43%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Kompanio 900T	Exynos 2000
Total score	494245	645405
CPU	138383	180721
GPU	187804	245243
MEM	79088	103264
UX	88972	116171

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Kompanio 900T	Exynos 2000
Single-Core	1058	1268
Multi-Core	3495	4045

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Kompanio 900T	Exynos 2000
Frequency	2600 MHz	2900 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	7 nm	5 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	2x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1 2x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	9 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x, LPDDR5	LPDDR5
Max. Memory	16 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	2133
Memory bandwidth	24	44
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache		192 KB
L2 cache		1 MB
L3 cache		2 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.4-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 2000 is 10% better than MediaTek Kompanio 900T in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G68 MC4	Mali-G78 MP10
GPU Frequency	800 MHz	700 MHz
GFloPS	686	854
# of Cores	4	24
# of Shader Units	128
Display	2000 x 1000 pixels	4096 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	29.9	29.5
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	44.5	72.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	57.6	100.5
Call of Duty: Mobile	54.3	56.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	35.6	62.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	56.9	91.1
Real Racing 3	113.9	175.9
Sniper 3D	107.4	160.8
Need for Speed No Limits	79.1	140.7
Mortal Kombat X	91.9	130.7
CSR Racing 2	67.6	140.7

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	108 MP	240 MP
Dual Camera resolution	20 MP	48 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	120
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem	5G Multi-Mode	Exynos Modem 5200
Download speed	2770 MBit/s.	14000 MBit/s.
Upload speed	1800 MBit/s.	12000 MBit/s.
Navigation	Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1 + E5a, NavIC, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5	Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, SBAS, NaVIC
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 900T is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2000 is better: 32
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MediaTek Kompanio 900T SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Kompanio 900T specs and review.

Exynos 2000 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 2000 specs and review.