 |
Qualcomm QCS6490 vs Rockchip RK3566 |
|
Comparisons 18-02-2023 Detailed testing data of Qualcomm QCS6490 vs Rockchip RK3566, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as Geekbench, Quadrant, PassMark, Neocore, GFXBench, 3DMark, Vellamo, PCMark, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Madout2, GTA, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Minecraft, PUBG, Fortnite etc. After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy QCS6490 or Rockchip RK3566.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreQCS6490 | 42% |
Rockchip RK3566 | 4% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)QCS6490 | 81% |
Rockchip RK3566 | 48% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingQCS6490 | 40% |
Rockchip RK3566 | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | QCS6490 |
Rockchip RK3566 | Total score | 592145 | 64108 | CPU | 165802 | 17946 | GPU | 225011 | 24359 | MEM | 94749 | 10248 | UX | 106579 | 11530 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | QCS6490 |
Rockchip RK3566 | Single-Core | 920 | 168 | Multi-Core | 3344 | 503 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | QCS6490 |
Rockchip RK3566 | Frequency | 2700 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 8 | 4 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 6 nm | 22 nm | Transistors count | 5200 millions | | Core configuration | 1x2.7 GHz Kryo 670 Gold Plus 3x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 Gold 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 670 Silver | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 667 | Memory bandwidth | 16 | 16 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 512 KB | 128 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 2 MB | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.3-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here QCS6490 is 25% better than Rockchip RK3566 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that QCS6490 has -4 more core than Rockchip RK3566. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 643L | Mali-G52 2EEMC2 | GPU Frequency | 812 MHz | 820 MHz | GFloPS | 1573 | 404 | # of Cores | | 2 | # of Shader Units | 576 | | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 26.4 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 67.5 | 13.9 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 92.6 | 23.9 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 51.5 | 15.2 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 57.8 | 11.1 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 84.9 | 14.5 | Real Racing 3 | 115.8 | 29.2 | Sniper 3D | 148.5 | 30.4 | Need for Speed No Limits | 129.7 | 37.8 | Mortal Kombat X | 120.8 | 30.1 | CSR Racing 2 | 120.9 | 32.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 192 MP | 16 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 36 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 570L | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG, H.264 (AVC), H.265 (HEVC), VP8, VP9 | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Modem QCM6490 5G | | Download speed | 3700 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 1600 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | NavIC enabled, GBeidou, GLONASS, GPS, QZSS, Galileo | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm QCS6490 is better: 37
The number of parameters for which Rockchip RK3566 is better: 4 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
QCS6490 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCM4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra
Rockchip RK3566 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs Rockchip RK3562
| |
|