Samsung Exynos 2000 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which processor or chip is better? Full compare data of benchmarks Samsung Exynos 2000 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus, speed testing of GPUs Mali-G78 MP10 and Mali-G77 MC9.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: Exynos 2000 is octa-core (Cortex-X1) and Dimensity 1000 Plus is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A77). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful review of all the specifications of the chipsets, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special test applications such as AnTuTu 8, Octane V2, Neocore, GFXBench, WebXPRT 3, PCMark, Mozilla Kraken, Quadrant, 3DMark, Geekbench, PassMark, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of processors in Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Real Racing 3, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, PUBG, Mortal Kombat, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc.
   After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processors is better to buy Exynos 2000 or Dimensity 1000 Plus and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Exynos 2000

46%

Dimensity 1000 Plus

36%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Exynos 2000

79%

Dimensity 1000 Plus

79%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Exynos 2000

43%

Dimensity 1000 Plus

35%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Exynos 2000	Dimensity 1000 Plus
Total score	645405	502425
CPU	180721	140682
GPU	245243	190923
MEM	103264	80391
UX	116171	90427

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Exynos 2000	Dimensity 1000 Plus
Single-Core	1268	908
Multi-Core	4045	3316

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Exynos 2000	Dimensity 1000 Plus
Frequency	2900 MHz	2600 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	5 nm	7 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1 2x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	4x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	9 W	10 W
Memory type	LPDDR5	LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	16 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	2133
Memory bandwidth	44	29.87
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	192 KB
L2 cache	1 MB
L3 cache	2 MB	8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8.3-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 2000 is 10% better than Dimensity 1000 Plus in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G78 MP10	Mali-G77 MC9
GPU Frequency	700 MHz	800 MHz
GFloPS	854	504
# of Cores	24	9
# of Shader Units
Display	4096 x 2160 pixels	2520 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	29.5	30.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	72.8	44.7
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	100.5	57.7
Call of Duty: Mobile	56.1	54.6
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	62.4	36.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	91.1	57.3
Real Racing 3	175.9	115.4
Sniper 3D	160.8	109.6
Need for Speed No Limits	140.7	80.8
Mortal Kombat X	130.7	92.3
CSR Racing 2	140.7	69.2

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	240 MP	80 MP
Dual Camera resolution	48 MP	32 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	120	240
Video Encoding resolution	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9	H.264, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Exynos Modem 5200	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	14000 MBit/s.	4700 MBit/s.
Upload speed	12000 MBit/s.	2500 MBit/s.
Navigation	Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, SBAS, NaVIC	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2000 is better: 33
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus is better: 5
You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs Exynos 2000 and Dimensity 1000 Plus, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Exynos 2000 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 2000 specs and review.

Dimensity 1000 Plus SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10

• Dimensity 1000 Plus specs and review.