Comparisons 11-03-2021
Well, which processor or chip is better? Full compare data of benchmarks Samsung Exynos 2000 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus, speed testing of GPUs Mali-G78 MP10 and Mali-G77 MC9.
This performance comparison involves two processors: Exynos 2000 is octa-core (Cortex-X1) and Dimensity 1000 Plus is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A77). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful review of all the specifications of the chipsets, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special test applications such as AnTuTu 8, Octane V2, Neocore, GFXBench, WebXPRT 3, PCMark, Mozilla Kraken, Quadrant, 3DMark, Geekbench, PassMark, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of processors in Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Real Racing 3, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, PUBG, Mortal Kombat, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc.
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processors is better to buy Exynos 2000 or Dimensity 1000 Plus and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Exynos 2000 | 97% |
Dimensity 1000 Plus | 90% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Exynos 2000 | 93% |
Dimensity 1000 Plus | 69% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Exynos 2000 | 90% |
Dimensity 1000 Plus | 84% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Exynos 2000 |
Dimensity 1000 Plus | | Total score | 645405 | 502425 | | CPU | 194979 | 163368 | | GPU | 273165 | 139627 | | MEM | 106071 | 106600 | | UX | 98549 | 93142 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Exynos 2000 |
Dimensity 1000 Plus | | Single-Core | 1268 | 1069 | | Multi-Core | 4045 | 3316 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Exynos 2000 |
Dimensity 1000 Plus | | Frequency | 2900 MHz | 2600 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1
2x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 4x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 9 W | 10 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4x | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 2133 | | Memory bandwidth | 44 | 29.87 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 192 KB | | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | | L3 cache | 2 MB | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.3-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 2000 is 10% better than Dimensity 1000 Plus in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G78 MP10 | Mali-G77 MC9 | | GPU Frequency | 700 MHz | 800 MHz | | GFloPS | 854 | 504 | | # of Cores | 24 | 9 | | # of Shader Units | | | | Display | 4096 x 2160 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | 29.5 | 30.1 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 72.8 | 44.7 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 100.5 | 57.7 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | 56.1 | 54.6 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 62.4 | 36.4 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 91.1 | 57.3 | | Real Racing 3 | 175.9 | 115.4 | | Sniper 3D | 160.8 | 109.6 | | Need for Speed No Limits | 140.7 | 80.8 | | Mortal Kombat X | 130.7 | 92.3 | | CSR Racing 2 | 140.7 | 69.2 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 240 MP | 80 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 48 MP | 32 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 240 | | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9 | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Exynos Modem 5200 | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | | Download speed | 14000 MBit/s. | 4700 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 12000 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | | Navigation | Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, SBAS, NaVIC | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | No | No | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2000 is better: 32
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus is better: 6
You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs Exynos 2000 and Dimensity 1000 Plus, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
• Antutu 8
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Snapdragon 875 Vs Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Apple A12Z Bionic Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• HiSilicon Kirin 9000 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• HiSilicon Kirin 9000E Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
|
