|
Qualcomm QCS6490 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 |
|
Comparisons 18-02-2023 Comprehensive compare data of Qualcomm QCS6490 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as Geekbench, PCMark, GFXBench, Neocore, AnTuTu, Quadrant, PassMark, 3DMark, Vellamo, and how good the SoCs are in games Minecraft, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, GTA, Madout2, PUBG, Call of Duty etc. After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy QCS6490 or Snapdragon 898.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreQCS6490 | 42% |
Snapdragon 898 | 72% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)QCS6490 | 81% |
Snapdragon 898 | 82% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingQCS6490 | 40% |
Snapdragon 898 | 69% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | QCS6490 |
Snapdragon 898 | Total score | 592145 | 1004791 | CPU | 165802 | 281332 | GPU | 225011 | 381820 | MEM | 94749 | 160773 | UX | 106579 | 180867 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | QCS6490 |
Snapdragon 898 | Single-Core | 920 | 1401 | Multi-Core | 3344 | 4418 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | QCS6490 |
Snapdragon 898 | Frequency | 2700 MHz | 3090 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 6 nm | 4 nm | Transistors count | 5200 millions | | Core configuration | 1x2.7 GHz Kryo 670 Gold Plus 3x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 Gold 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 670 Silver | 1x3.09 GHz Cortex-X2 3x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A510 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 6 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 16 | 88 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 2 MB | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.3-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 898 is 12% better than QCS6490 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 643L | Adreno 730 | GPU Frequency | 812 MHz | 970 MHz | GFloPS | 1573 | 1800 | # of Cores | | | # of Shader Units | 576 | 1024 | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 7680 x 4320 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 26.4 | 37.5 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 67.5 | 119.4 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 92.6 | 70.5 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 51.5 | 65.5 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 57.8 | 101.1 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 84.9 | 147.2 | Real Racing 3 | 115.8 | 142.7 | Sniper 3D | 148.5 | 157.3 | Need for Speed No Limits | 129.7 | 99.7 | Mortal Kombat X | 120.8 | 102.3 | CSR Racing 2 | 120.9 | 86.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 192 MP | 320 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 36 MP | 128 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 570L | Qualcomm Spectra 680 | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 120 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG, H.264 (AVC), H.265 (HEVC), VP8, VP9 | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Modem QCM6490 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon X65 Modem-RF System 5G | Download speed | 3700 MBit/s. | 15000 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 1600 MBit/s. | 6000 MBit/s. | Navigation | NavIC enabled, GBeidou, GLONASS, GPS, QZSS, Galileo | NavIC enabled, GLONASS, Galileo, GPS, SBAS, GNSS, Dual frequency GNSS, Beidou, NavIC, QZSS | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm QCS6490 is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 is better: 31 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
QCS6490 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCM4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
Snapdragon 898 SoC Comparisons • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
| |
|