Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which chip or processor is better? Full comparison data of benchmarks Samsung Exynos 2000 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000, speed testing of GPUs Mali-G78 MP24 and Mali-G78 MP10. This performance comparison includes two processors: Exynos 2000 is octa-core (Cortex-X1) and Kirin 9000 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A77). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics of the chipsets, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special test applications such as Quadrant, 3DMark, WebXPRT 3, Vellamo, PassMark, GFXBench, Neocore, Geekbench 5, Mozilla Kraken, AnTuTu 8, Octane V2, PCMark, even the gaming performance of processors in Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, PUBG, Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3 etc. After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which chipset is better to buy Exynos 2000 or Kirin 9000 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreExynos 2000 | 97% |
Kirin 9000 | 99% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Exynos 2000 | 93% |
Kirin 9000 | 93% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingExynos 2000 | 90% |
Kirin 9000 | 95% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Exynos 2000 |
Kirin 9000 | Total score | 645405 | 698731 | CPU | 194979 | 222644 | GPU | 273165 | 234492 | MEM | 106071 | 130499 | UX | 98549 | 110815 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Exynos 2000 |
Kirin 9000 | Single-Core | 1268 | 1023 | Multi-Core | 4045 | 3714 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Exynos 2000 |
Kirin 9000 | Frequency | 2900 MHz | 3130 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1 2x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 1x3 13 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 3x2.54 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x2.06 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 9 W | 6 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5, LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 1600 | Memory bandwidth | 44 | 44 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 192 KB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 2 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 9000 is 7% better than Exynos 2000 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G78 MP10 | Mali-G78 MP24 | GPU Frequency | 700 MHz | 650 MHz | GFloPS | 854 | 1076 | # of Cores | 24 | 24 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 4096 x 2160 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 29.5 | 27.3 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 72.8 | 83.9 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 100.5 | 50.6 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 56.1 | 46.4 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 62.4 | 71.3 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 91.1 | 103.1 | Real Racing 3 | 175.9 | 88.6 | Sniper 3D | 160.8 | 65.8 | Need for Speed No Limits | 140.7 | 60.7 | Mortal Kombat X | 130.7 | 65.8 | CSR Racing 2 | 140.7 | 60.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 240 MP | 128 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 48 MP | 64 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9 | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Exynos Modem 5200 | Balong 5G | Download speed | 14000 MBit/s. | 15000 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 12000 MBit/s. | 14000 MBit/s. | Navigation | Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, SBAS, NaVIC | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | Yes | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2000 is better: 21
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 9000 is better: 15 You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets Exynos 2000 and Kirin 9000, as well as read the test results at the links below. • Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • Antutu 8 • 3DMark • GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle • Apple M1 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • 3DMark • Antutu 8 • GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle • Apple M1 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Snapdragon 875 Vs Kirin 9000 • MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
|