MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs Samsung Exynos 2000

Comparisons 11-03-2021

Well, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive comparison data of benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs Samsung Exynos 2000, speed testing of GPUs Mali-G77 MC9 and Mali-G78 MP10.

This performance comparison involves two processors: Dimensity 1100 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A78) and Exynos 2000 is octa-core (Cortex-X1). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.

From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications such as WebXPRT 3, PCMark, Quadrant, GFXBench, Vellamo, Geekbench 5, 3DMark, Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, AnTuTu 8, Octane V2, PassMark, even the gaming performance of chips in Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.

After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy Dimensity 1100 or Exynos 2000 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Dimensity 1100

42%

Exynos 2000

46%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Dimensity 1100

79%

Exynos 2000

79%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Dimensity 1100

39%

Exynos 2000

43%

Antutu 8

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Dimensity 1100	Exynos 2000
Total score	592862	645405
CPU	165998	180721
GPU	225277	245243
MEM	94858	103264
UX	106709	116171

GeekBench 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Dimensity 1100	Exynos 2000
Single-Core	1261	1268
Multi-Core	3913	4045

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Dimensity 1100	Exynos 2000
Frequency	2600 MHz	2900 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	6 nm	5 nm
Transistors count	5600 millions
Core configuration	4x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	2x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1 2x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	10 W	9 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x	LPDDR5
Max. Memory	16 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	4266	2133
Memory bandwidth	29	44
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	32 KB	192 KB
L2 cache	320 KB	1 MB
L3 cache	8 MB	2 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 2000 is 10% better than Dimensity 1100 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G77 MC9	Mali-G78 MP10
GPU Frequency	800 MHz	700 MHz
GFloPS	504	854
# of Cores	9	24
# of Shader Units
Display	2520 x 1080 pixels	4096 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	26.7	29.5
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	67.2	72.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	92.9	100.5
Call of Duty: Mobile	51.5	56.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	57.1	62.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	84.7	91.1
Real Racing 3	116.1	175.9
Sniper 3D	148.6	160.8
Need for Speed No Limits	130.1	140.7
Mortal Kombat X	120.8	130.7
CSR Racing 2	120.8	140.7

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	108 MP	240 MP
Dual Camera resolution	32 MP	48 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	120
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	Exynos Modem 5200
Download speed	4700 MBit/s.	14000 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2500 MBit/s.	12000 MBit/s.
Navigation	Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5	Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, SBAS, NaVIC
NFC support	Yes	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 1100 is better: 9
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2000 is better: 32
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets Dimensity 1100 and Exynos 2000, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Dimensity 1100 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 5 mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark

• Dimensity 1100 specs and review.

Exynos 2000 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile

• Exynos 2000 specs and review.