Comparisons 11-03-2021
Well, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive comparison data of benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs Samsung Exynos 2000, speed testing of GPUs Mali-G77 MC9 and Mali-G78 MP10.
This performance comparison involves two processors: Dimensity 1100 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A78) and Exynos 2000 is octa-core (Cortex-X1). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications such as WebXPRT 3, PCMark, Quadrant, GFXBench, Vellamo, Geekbench 5, 3DMark, Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, AnTuTu 8, Octane V2, PassMark, even the gaming performance of chips in Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy Dimensity 1100 or Exynos 2000 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Dimensity 1100 | 99% |
Exynos 2000 | 97% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Dimensity 1100 | 81% |
Exynos 2000 | 93% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Dimensity 1100 | 97% |
Exynos 2000 | 90% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Dimensity 1100 |
Exynos 2000 | | Total score | 592862 | 645405 | | CPU | 163368 | 194979 | | GPU | 139627 | 273165 | | MEM | 106600 | 106071 | | UX | 93142 | 98549 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Dimensity 1100 |
Exynos 2000 | | Single-Core | 1261 | 1268 | | Multi-Core | 3913 | 4045 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Dimensity 1100 |
Exynos 2000 | | Frequency | 2600 MHz | 2900 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 5600 millions | | | Core configuration | 4x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1
2x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 9 W | | Memory type | LPDDR4x | LPDDR5 | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4266 | 2133 | | Memory bandwidth | 29 | 44 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 32 KB | 192 KB | | L2 cache | 320 KB | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 2 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 2000 is 10% better than Dimensity 1100 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G78 MP10 | | GPU Frequency | 800 MHz | 700 MHz | | GFloPS | 504 | 854 | | # of Cores | 9 | 24 | | # of Shader Units | | | | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 4096 x 2160 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | 26.7 | 29.5 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 67.2 | 72.8 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 92.9 | 100.5 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | 51.5 | 56.1 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 57.1 | 62.4 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 84.7 | 91.1 | | Real Racing 3 | 116.1 | 175.9 | | Sniper 3D | 148.6 | 160.8 | | Need for Speed No Limits | 130.1 | 140.7 | | Mortal Kombat X | 120.8 | 130.7 | | CSR Racing 2 | 120.8 | 140.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 108 MP | 240 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 32 MP | 48 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 120 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Exynos Modem 5200 | | Download speed | 4700 MBit/s. | 14000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 12000 MBit/s. | | Navigation | Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5 | Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, SBAS, NaVIC | | NFC support | Yes | No | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 1100 is better: 10
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2000 is better: 31
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets Dimensity 1100 and Exynos 2000, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 5 mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
|
