Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs Samsung Exynos 2000 benchmark which processor is better

MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs Samsung Exynos 2000

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive comparison data of benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs Samsung Exynos 2000, speed testing of GPUs Mali-G77 MC9 and Mali-G78 MP10.

   This performance comparison involves two processors: Dimensity 1100 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A78) and Exynos 2000 is octa-core (Cortex-X1). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.

   From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications such as WebXPRT 3, PCMark, Quadrant, GFXBench, Vellamo, Geekbench 5, 3DMark, Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, AnTuTu 8, Octane V2, PassMark, even the gaming performance of chips in Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.

   After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy Dimensity 1100 or Exynos 2000 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2.

 
MediaTek Dimensity 1100
Samsung Exynos 2000

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors

CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Dimensity 110099% Exynos 200097%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Dimensity 110081% Exynos 200093%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Dimensity 110097% Exynos 200090%

Antutu 8

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Dimensity 1100 Exynos 2000
Total score592862645405
CPU163368194979
GPU139627273165
MEM106600106071
UX9314298549

GeekBench 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Dimensity 1100 Exynos 2000
Single-Core12611268
Multi-Core39134045

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Dimensity 1100 Exynos 2000
Frequency2600 MHz2900 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography6 nm5 nm
Transistors count5600 millions
Core configuration4x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
2x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1
2x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)10 W9 W
Memory typeLPDDR4xLPDDR5
Max. Memory16 Gb16 Gb
Memory Frequency42662133
Memory bandwidth2944
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache32 KB192 KB
L2 cache320 KB1 MB
L3 cache8 MB2 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8.2-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 2000 is 10% better than Dimensity 1100 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-G77 MC9Mali-G78 MP10
GPU Frequency800 MHz700 MHz
GFloPS504854
# of Cores924
# of Shader Units
Display2520 x 1080 pixels4096 x 2160 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile26.729.5
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)67.272.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra92.9100.5
Call of Duty: Mobile51.556.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)57.162.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition84.791.1
Real Racing 3116.1175.9
Sniper 3D148.6160.8
Need for Speed No Limits130.1140.7
Mortal Kombat X120.8130.7
CSR Racing 2120.8140.7
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution108 MP240 MP
Dual Camera resolution32 MP48 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS240120
Video Encoding resolution4K, 2K, FullHD8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264, H.265/HEVCH.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9


Networks and Navigation
ModemSub 6GHz 5G Multi-ModeExynos Modem 5200
Download speed4700 MBit/s.14000 MBit/s.
Upload speed2500 MBit/s.12000 MBit/s.
NavigationGalileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, SBAS, NaVIC
NFC supportYesNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 1100 is better: 10
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2000 is better: 31
   You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets Dimensity 1100 and Exynos 2000, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 5 mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark


CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2100

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile


CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
Categories
 • Comparisons
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 5
 • Antutu 8
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands
Last added

Core i9-11900H vs Ryzen 7 5800X..
Core i9-11950H vs Ryzen Threadri..
Core i9-11950H vs Core i9-9940X..
Core i9-11900H vs Core i7-11700K..
Core i9-10900E vs Ryzen 7 PRO 47..
Core i9-10900E vs Ryzen 5 5600H..
Core i9-10900E vs Ryzen 7 Extrem..
Core i9-10900TE vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4..
Core i9-11900H vs Ryzen 9 5980HS..
Core i9-11900KB vs Core i9-11900..
Core i9-11980HK vs Core i9-7980X..
Intel Core i9-11900KB Cinebench r23
Core i9-11950H vs Xeon Gold 6248..
Intel Core i9-10900E Cinebench r15
Core i9-10900E vs Core i5-11500T..
Core i9-11980HK vs Ryzen 9 5900..
Core i9-11900H vs Ryzen Threadri..
Core i9-11900KB vs Core i9-11900..
Intel Core i9-11950H GeekBench 5
Core i9-11980HK vs Core i7-11700..
Core i9-10900E vs Core i7-9800X..
Core i9-10900TE vs Xeon E5-2697R..
Core i9-11900KB vs Xeon W-2275..
Intel Core i9-11900KB GeekBench 5
Core i9-11950H vs Ryzen Threadri..
Intel Core i9-10900E GeekBench 5
Core i9-11950H vs Core i9-11900F..
Intel Core i9-11900H Cinebench r20
Core i9-10900E vs Ryzen 7 2700..
Core i9-11900H vs Ryzen 7 5700G..
Core i9-11900H vs Core i9-11900F..
Core i9-11900KB vs Core i9-10920..
Core i9-11900KB vs Core i9-10980..
Core i9-11950H vs Ryzen 7 5800X..
Core i9-11950H vs Ryzen Threadri..
Core i9-10900TE vs Core i7-10700..
Core i9-10900TE vs Ryzen 5 4600H..
Core i9-10900E vs Core i9-10885H..
Core i9-11950H vs Ryzen 7 Pro 58..
Core i9-10900TE vs Core i9-10885..