Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G vs Samsung Exynos 2000

Comparisons 11-03-2021

Well, which chip or processor is better? Full data of speed tests and benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G vs Samsung Exynos 2000, comparison of GPUs Adreno 640 and Mali-G78 MP10.

This performance comparison includes two processors: Snapdragon 775G is octa-core (Kryo 575 Prime) and Exynos 2000 is octa-core (Cortex-X1). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the SoCs, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.

From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests such as PassMark, PCMark, AnTuTu, Vellamo, WebXPRT 3, Octane V2, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5, Neocore, 3DMark, GFXBench, Mozilla Kraken, and how good the chipsets are in games Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG, Fortnite, Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3 etc.

After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chipset is better to buy Snapdragon 775G or Exynos 2000 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Snapdragon 775G

39%

Exynos 2000

46%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Snapdragon 775G

78%

Exynos 2000

79%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Snapdragon 775G

36%

Exynos 2000

43%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Snapdragon 775G	Exynos 2000
Total score	542926	645405
CPU	152014	180721
GPU	206313	245243
MEM	86877	103264
UX	97716	116171

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Snapdragon 775G	Exynos 2000
Single-Core	1216	1268
Multi-Core	4134	4045

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Snapdragon 775G	Exynos 2000
Frequency	3000 MHz	2900 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	6 nm	5 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	1x3.0 GHz Kryo 575 Prime 1x2.4 GHz Kryo 575 Gold 6x2.0 GHz Kryo 575 Silver	2x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1 2x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	9 W
Memory type	LPDDR5	LPDDR5
Max. Memory	16 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	4666	2133
Memory bandwidth	17	44
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	512 KB	192 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	2 MB	2 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.3-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 775G is 3% better than Exynos 2000 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Adreno 640	Mali-G78 MP10
GPU Frequency	750 MHz	700 MHz
GFloPS	986	854
# of Cores		24
# of Shader Units	384
Display	2520 x 1080 pixels	4096 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	26.5	29.5
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	56.2	72.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	53.2	100.5
Call of Duty: Mobile	54.6	56.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	44.4	62.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	70.6	91.1
Real Racing 3	106.4	175.9
Sniper 3D	117	160.8
Need for Speed No Limits	85.1	140.7
Mortal Kombat X	61.2	130.7
CSR Racing 2	63.8	140.7

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	192 MP	240 MP
Dual Camera resolution	22 MP	48 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)	Qualcomm Spectra 355
Video Encoding FPS	60	120
Video Encoding resolution	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC	H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Qualcomm Snapdragon X55 Modem-RF System 5G	Exynos Modem 5200
Download speed	7000 MBit/s.	14000 MBit/s.
Upload speed	3500 MBit/s.	12000 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS	Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, SBAS, NaVIC
NFC support	Yes	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G is better: 11
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2000 is better: 27
You need to know that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Snapdragon 775G SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Snapdragon 775G specs and review.

Exynos 2000 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 2000 specs and review.