Samsung Exynos 2000 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G

Comparisons 11-03-2021

So, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive compare data of benchmarks Samsung Exynos 2000 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, speed testing of GPUs Adreno 620 and Mali-G78 MP10.

This performance comparison involves two processors: Exynos 2000 is octa-core (Cortex-X1) and Snapdragon 765G is octa-core (Kryo 475 Prime). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough review of all the specifications of the processors, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.

From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as Vellamo, GFXBench, 3DMark, PCMark, Neocore, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5, AnTuTu, Mozilla Kraken, Octane V2, Quadrant, WebXPRT 3, and how good the SoCs are in games Fortnite, Mortal Kombat, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc.

After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chip is better to buy Exynos 2000 or Snapdragon 765G and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Exynos 2000

46%

Snapdragon 765G

21%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Exynos 2000

79%

Snapdragon 765G

74%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Exynos 2000

43%

Snapdragon 765G

19%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Exynos 2000	Snapdragon 765G
Total score	645405	304160
CPU	180721	85154
GPU	245243	115588
MEM	103264	48671
UX	116171	54738

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Exynos 2000	Snapdragon 765G
Single-Core	1268	681
Multi-Core	4045	2316

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Exynos 2000	Snapdragon 765G
Frequency	2900 MHz	2400 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	5 nm	7 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1 2x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver
Power consumption (TDP)	9 W	8 W
Memory type	LPDDR5	LPDDR4x (Dual Channel)
Max. Memory	16 Gb	12 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	2133
Memory bandwidth	44	17
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	192 KB
L2 cache	1 MB
L3 cache	2 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8.3-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 2000 is 17% better than Snapdragon 765G in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G78 MP10	Adreno 620
GPU Frequency	700 MHz	750 MHz
GFloPS	854	896
# of Cores	24
# of Shader Units		384
Display	4096 x 2160 pixels	2520 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	29.5	31.5
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	72.8	55.1
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	100.5	62.5
Call of Duty: Mobile	56.1	40.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	62.4	51.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	91.1	75.6
Real Racing 3	175.9	93.8
Sniper 3D	160.8	137.5
Need for Speed No Limits	140.7	112.5
Mortal Kombat X	130.7	100
CSR Racing 2	140.7	75

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	240 MP	192 MP
Dual Camera resolution	48 MP	22 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)		Qualcomm Spectra 355
Video Encoding FPS	120	60
Video Encoding resolution	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Exynos Modem 5200	Qualcomm Snapdragon X52 Modem-RF System
Download speed	14000 MBit/s.	3700 MBit/s.
Upload speed	12000 MBit/s.	1600 MBit/s.
Navigation	Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, SBAS, NaVIC	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2000 is better: 34
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G is better: 6
You need to know that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs Exynos 2000 and Snapdragon 765G, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Exynos 2000 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 2000 specs and review.

Snapdragon 765G SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Snapdragon 765G specs and review.