|
Samsung Exynos 2000 vs Apple A13 Bionic |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive data of speed tests and benchmarks Samsung Exynos 2000 vs Apple A13 Bionic, comparison of GPUs Apple A13 Bionic and Mali-G78 MP10. This performance comparison involves two processors: Exynos 2000 is octa-core (Cortex-X1) and A13 Bionic is gexa-core (Icestorm). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special testing software like PassMark, Neocore, AnTuTu, Mozilla Kraken, Vellamo, Octane V2, 3DMark, GFXBench, PCMark, WebXPRT 3, Quadrant, Geekbench, and how good the SoCs are in games Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, PUBG etc. After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which chipset is better to buy Exynos 2000 or A13 Bionic and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreExynos 2000 | 46% |
A13 Bionic | 37% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Exynos 2000 | 79% |
A13 Bionic | 73% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingExynos 2000 | 43% |
A13 Bionic | 35% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Exynos 2000 |
A13 Bionic | Total score | 645405 | 521807 | CPU | 180721 | 146108 | GPU | 245243 | 198279 | MEM | 103264 | 83491 | UX | 116171 | 93922 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Exynos 2000 |
A13 Bionic | Single-Core | 1268 | 1111 | Multi-Core | 4045 | 3444 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Exynos 2000 |
A13 Bionic | Frequency | 2900 MHz | 2660 MHz | Cores | 8 | 6 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | | 8500 millions | Core configuration | 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1 2x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 2x2.66 GHz Icestorm 4x1.6 GHz Firestorm | Power consumption (TDP) | 9 W | 6 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 4266 | Memory bandwidth | 44 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 192 KB | 48 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 4 MB | L3 cache | 2 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.3-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 2000 is 8% better than A13 Bionic in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Exynos 2000 has -2 more core than A13 Bionic. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G78 MP10 | Apple A13 Bionic | GPU Frequency | 700 MHz | 2600 MHz | GFloPS | 854 | 786 | # of Cores | 24 | 4 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 4096 x 2160 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 29.5 | 62.6 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 72.8 | 56.5 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 100.5 | 62.9 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 56.1 | 62.1 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 62.4 | 50.7 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 91.1 | 76.4 | Real Racing 3 | 175.9 | 125.8 | Sniper 3D | 160.8 | 138.4 | Need for Speed No Limits | 140.7 | 88.1 | Mortal Kombat X | 130.7 | 100.6 | CSR Racing 2 | 140.7 | 81.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 240 MP | 12 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 48 MP | 12 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Apple ISP | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 960 | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9 | Dolby Vision, H.265 (HEVC), HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, H.264 (AVC), VP8, VP9 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Exynos Modem 5200 | Intel XMM 7660 LTE | Download speed | 14000 MBit/s. | 1600 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 12000 MBit/s. | 225 MBit/s. | Navigation | Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, SBAS, NaVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, Beidou | NFC support | No | Yes | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2000 is better: 31
The number of parameters for which Apple A13 Bionic is better: 11 You need to know that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Exynos 2000 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Samsung Exynos 2000 Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
A13 Bionic SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 875 • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs Dimensity 1000L • Vs A14 Bionic • Vs Snapdragon 865 • Vs Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Exynos 2100 • Vs A12X Bionic • Vs Exynos 1080 • Vs Kirin 9000E • Vs Kirin 9000 • Vs Snapdragon 888 • Vs A12Z Bionic • Vs Exynos 990 • Vs Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Kirin 990 5G • Vs Kirin 990E • Vs Dimensity 1000C • Vs Kirin 985 • Vs A12 Bionic • Vs Dimensity 820 • Vs Exynos 9 9820 • Vs Kirin 820 5G • Vs Exynos 9825 • Vs Kirin 980 • Vs Snapdragon 768G • Vs Dimensity 800 • Vs Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Dimensity 800U • Vs Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Helio G95 • Vs Snapdragon 765G • Vs Snapdragon 855 • Vs Snapdragon 732G • Vs Helio G90 • Vs Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Helio G90T • Vs Tiger T710 • Vs Kirin 810 • Vs Tiger T7510 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm QCM5430 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000
| |
|