Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs Qualcomm QCS6490 benchmark which processor is better

Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs Qualcomm QCS6490

Comparisons   08-07-2023
   Detailed compare data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs Qualcomm QCS6490, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like GFXBench, PCMark, PassMark, AnTuTu, Geekbench, Quadrant, Vellamo, Neocore, 3DMark, and how good the CPUs are in games Fortnite, Minecraft, GTA, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Call of Duty, PUBG etc.
   After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which processors is better to buy Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 or QCS6490.

 
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
Qualcomm QCS6490

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Snapdragon 68521% QCS649042%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Snapdragon 68583% QCS649081%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Snapdragon 68519% QCS649040%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Snapdragon 685 QCS6490
Total score293373592145
CPU82144165802
GPU111483225011
MEM4693694749
UX52803106579

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Snapdragon 685 QCS6490
Single-Core492920
Multi-Core16053344

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Snapdragon 685 QCS6490
Frequency2800 MHz2700 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography6 nm6 nm
Transistors count5200 millions
Core configuration8x2.8 GHz Kryo 2651x2.7 GHz Kryo 670 Gold Plus
3x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 Gold
4x1.9 GHz Kryo 670 Silver
Power consumption (TDP)5 W5 W
Memory typeLPDDR4x (Dual Channel)LPDDR5
Max. Memory8 Gb16 Gb
Memory Frequency21333200
Memory bandwidth2216
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache512 KB
L2 cache1 MB
L3 cache2 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8.3-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 685 is 3% better than QCS6490 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUAdreno 610Adreno 643L
GPU Frequency750 MHz812 MHz
GFloPS3121573
# of Cores
# of Shader Units192576
Display2520 x 1080 pixels2520 x 1080 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile25.226.4
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)55.767.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra60.292.6
Call of Duty: Mobile54.451.5
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)49.157.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition74.684.9
Real Racing 375.3115.8
Sniper 3D96.7148.5
Need for Speed No Limits96.6129.7
Mortal Kombat X96.4120.8
CSR Racing 266.5120.9
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution108 MP192 MP
Dual Camera resolution13 MP36 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)Qualcomm Spectra 365Qualcomm Spectra 570L
Video Encoding FPS6060
Video Encoding resolution4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, VP8, VP9HDR10+, HDR10, HLG, H.264 (AVC), H.265 (HEVC), VP8, VP9


Networks and Navigation
ModemQualcomm Snapdragon X11 LTE modemModem QCM6490 5G
Download speed390 MBit/s.3700 MBit/s.
Upload speed150 MBit/s.1600 MBit/s.
NavigationBeidou, Galileo, GLONASS, NavIC, GPS, QZSSNavIC enabled, GBeidou, GLONASS, GPS, QZSS, Galileo
NFC supportNoYes
5G supportNoYes


Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm QCS6490 is better: 34
   Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Snapdragon 685 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
QCS6490 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


Snapdragon 685 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G95
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G96
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
• Vs MediaTek Helio G99
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845
• Vs MediaTek Helio G90T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G88
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs Samsung Exynos 980
• Vs MediaTek Helio G85
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T612
• Vs MediaTek Helio G80
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T618
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
• Vs Google Tensor G2
• Vs Apple A15 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max
• Vs Google Tensor
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1380
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1280
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1330
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
• Vs MediaTek MT8188J
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm 215
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T760
• Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
• Vs Rockchip RK3562
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL


QCS6490 SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs Qualcomm QCM6490
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm QCS7230
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Qualcomm QCS8250
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs Google Tensor
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs Apple A15 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
• Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
• Vs Apple A13 Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Vs Apple A12 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1280
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs Qualcomm 215
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCM4290
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Google Tensor G2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Apple A16 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9825
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A
• Vs Unisoc SC9832E
• Vs Rockchip RK3566
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula
• Vs MediaTek Helio G96
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands