Comparisons 14-05-2021
Detailed testing data of Apple M1 vs Samsung Exynos 2000, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like 3DMark, Vellamo, Geekbench, PCMark, Neocore, PassMark, AnTuTu, GFXBench, Quadrant, and how good the SoCs are in games Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Madout2, GTA, Minecraft, PUBG etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processors is better to buy M1 or Exynos 2000.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | M1 |
Exynos 2000 | | Total score | 1204017 | 645405 | | CPU | 179367 | 194979 | | GPU | 371998 | 273165 | | MEM | 95242 | 106071 | | UX | 75217 | 98549 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | M1 |
Exynos 2000 | | Single-Core | 1807 | 1268 | | Multi-Core | 7691 | 4045 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | M1 |
Exynos 2000 | | Frequency | 3200 MHz | 2900 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 16000 millions | | | Core configuration | 4x3.2 GHz Firestorm
4x2.0 GHz Icestorm | 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1
2x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 9 W | | Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2666 | 2133 | | Memory bandwidth | 64 | 44 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 48 KB | 192 KB | | L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 2 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv8.2-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here M1 is 9% better than Exynos 2000 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Apple M1 | Mali-G78 MP10 | | GPU Frequency | 3200 MHz | 700 MHz | | GFloPS | 2600 | 854 | | # of Cores | 8 | 24 | | # of Shader Units | 128 | | | Display | 2732 x 2048 pixels | 4096 x 2160 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 29.5 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 72.8 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 100.5 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 56.1 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 62.4 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 91.1 | | Real Racing 3 | | 175.9 | | Sniper 3D | | 160.8 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 140.7 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 130.7 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 140.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 24 MP | 240 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 24 MP | 48 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Apple ISP | | | Video Encoding FPS | 960 | 120 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.265 (HEVC), HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, H.264 (AVC), VP8, VP9 | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Snapdragon X80 5G | Exynos Modem 5200 | | Download speed | 9500 MBit/s. | 14000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 6000 MBit/s. | 12000 MBit/s. | | Navigation | Galileo, GLONASS, GPS, Beidou | Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, SBAS, NaVIC | | NFC support | Yes | No | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple M1 is better: 19
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2000 is better: 23
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
|
