Comparisons 03-12-2021
Full testing data of Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max vs Samsung Exynos 2000, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications of the chips, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like Vellamo, 3DMark, AnTuTu, Quadrant, Geekbench, GFXBench, Neocore, PCMark, PassMark, even the gaming performance of processors in PUBG, Madout2, GTA, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Fortnite etc.
After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy Dimensity 1200 Max or Exynos 2000.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Dimensity 1200 Max | 95% |
Exynos 2000 | 97% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Dimensity 1200 Max | 87% |
Exynos 2000 | 93% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Dimensity 1200 Max | 89% |
Exynos 2000 | 90% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Dimensity 1200 Max |
Exynos 2000 | | Total score | 691455 | 645405 | | CPU | 163368 | 194979 | | GPU | 139627 | 273165 | | MEM | 106600 | 106071 | | UX | 93142 | 98549 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Dimensity 1200 Max |
Exynos 2000 | | Single-Core | 1470 | 1268 | | Multi-Core | 4564 | 4045 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Dimensity 1200 Max |
Exynos 2000 | | Frequency | 3100 MHz | 2900 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 5800 millions | | | Core configuration | 1x3.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
3x2.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1
2x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 9 W | | Memory type | LPDDR4x | LPDDR5 | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4266 | 2133 | | Memory bandwidth | 29 | 44 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 32 KB | 192 KB | | L2 cache | 320 KB | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 2 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Dimensity 1200 Max is 6% better than Exynos 2000 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G77 MP11 | Mali-G78 MP10 | | GPU Frequency | 800 MHz | 700 MHz | | GFloPS | 786 | 854 | | # of Cores | 11 | 24 | | # of Shader Units | | | | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 4096 x 2160 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 29.5 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 72.8 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 100.5 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 56.1 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 62.4 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 91.1 | | Real Racing 3 | | 175.9 | | Sniper 3D | | 160.8 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 140.7 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 130.7 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 140.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 200 MP | 240 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 32 MP | 48 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 120 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Exynos Modem 5200 | | Download speed | 4700 MBit/s. | 14000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 12000 MBit/s. | | Navigation | GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, Galileo E1 + E5a, QZSS L1CA+ L5, Glonass L1OF, NavIC | Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, SBAS, NaVIC | | NFC support | Yes | No | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max is better: 14
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2000 is better: 27
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Google Tensor
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
|
