Comparisons 11-03-2021
So, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive data of benchmarks and speed tests Samsung Exynos 2000 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus, compare of GPUs Mali-G78 MP10 and Adreno 650.
This performance comparison includes two processors: Exynos 2000 is octa-core (Cortex-X1) and Snapdragon 865 Plus is octa-core (Kryo 585 Prime). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the chipsets, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as PCMark, 3DMark, Vellamo, Quadrant, PassMark, Neocore, AnTuTu 8, WebXPRT 3, Mozilla Kraken, GFXBench, Octane V2, Geekbench, and how good the processors are in games Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, PUBG, Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc.
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy Exynos 2000 or Snapdragon 865 Plus and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, Asphalt 9.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Exynos 2000 | 97% |
Snapdragon 865 Plus | 97% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Exynos 2000 | 93% |
Snapdragon 865 Plus | 81% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Exynos 2000 | 90% |
Snapdragon 865 Plus | 91% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Exynos 2000 |
Snapdragon 865 Plus | | Total score | 645405 | 663155 | | CPU | 194979 | 198282 | | GPU | 273165 | 247327 | | MEM | 106071 | 113635 | | UX | 98549 | 103275 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Exynos 2000 |
Snapdragon 865 Plus | | Single-Core | 1268 | 1042 | | Multi-Core | 4045 | 3647 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Exynos 2000 |
Snapdragon 865 Plus | | Frequency | 2900 MHz | 3100 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1
2x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 1x3.1 GHz Kryo 585 Prime
3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 Gold
4x1.8 GHz Kryo 585 Silver | | Power consumption (TDP) | 9 W | 10 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 2750 | | Memory bandwidth | 44 | 44 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 192 KB | 512 KB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 2 MB | 4 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 865 Plus is 6% better than Exynos 2000 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G78 MP10 | Adreno 650 | | GPU Frequency | 700 MHz | 645 MHz | | GFloPS | 854 | 1348 | | # of Cores | 24 | | | # of Shader Units | | 512 | | Display | 4096 x 2160 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | 29.5 | 30.9 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 72.8 | 75.2 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 100.5 | 103.7 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | 56.1 | 58.1 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 62.4 | 64.4 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 91.1 | 94.9 | | Real Racing 3 | 175.9 | 129.6 | | Sniper 3D | 160.8 | 165.9 | | Need for Speed No Limits | 140.7 | 145.2 | | Mortal Kombat X | 130.7 | 119.3 | | CSR Racing 2 | 140.7 | 145.2 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 240 MP | 200 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 48 MP | 25 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Qualcomm Spectra 480 | | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 60 | | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Exynos Modem 5200 | Qualcomm Snapdragon X55 Modem-RF System 5G | | Download speed | 14000 MBit/s. | 7500 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 12000 MBit/s. | 3000 MBit/s. | | Navigation | Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, SBAS, NaVIC | QZSS, SBAS, Galileo, Beidou, GPS, NavIC enabled, GNSS, GLONASS, Dual frequency GNSS | | NFC support | No | Yes | | 5G support | No | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2000 is better: 15
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus is better: 22
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Snapdragon 875 Vs Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
|
