Comparisons 11-03-2021
Well, which processor or chip is better? Detailed compare data of benchmarks Samsung Exynos 2000 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E, speed examination of GPUs Mali-G78 MP10 and Mali-G78 MP22.
This performance comparison includes two processors: Exynos 2000 is octa-core (Cortex-X1) and Kirin 9000E is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A77). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications like PassMark, Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, GFXBench, AnTuTu, Vellamo, PCMark, WebXPRT 3, Octane V2, Geekbench 5, 3DMark, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of processors in Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock, PUBG, Real Racing 3 etc.
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which SoCs is better to buy Exynos 2000 or Kirin 9000E and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Exynos 2000 | 97% |
Kirin 9000E | 98% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Exynos 2000 | 93% |
Kirin 9000E | 93% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Exynos 2000 | 90% |
Kirin 9000E | 91% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Exynos 2000 |
Kirin 9000E | | Total score | 645405 | 678577 | | CPU | 194979 | 216046 | | GPU | 273165 | 227655 | | MEM | 106071 | 126580 | | UX | 98549 | 107532 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Exynos 2000 |
Kirin 9000E | | Single-Core | 1268 | 992 | | Multi-Core | 4045 | 3714 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Exynos 2000 |
Kirin 9000E | | Frequency | 2900 MHz | 313 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1
2x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 1x3
13 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
3x2.54 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
4x2.06 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 9 W | 6 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5, LPDDR4x | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 1600 | | Memory bandwidth | 44 | 44 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 192 KB | | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | | L3 cache | 2 MB | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 2000 is 89% better than Kirin 9000E in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G78 MP10 | Mali-G78 MP22 | | GPU Frequency | 700 MHz | 650 MHz | | GFloPS | 854 | 986 | | # of Cores | 24 | 22 | | # of Shader Units | | | | Display | 4096 x 2160 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | 29.5 | 26.7 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 72.8 | 80.3 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 100.5 | 48.7 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | 56.1 | 44.1 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 62.4 | 68.9 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 91.1 | 100.7 | | Real Racing 3 | 175.9 | 60.9 | | Sniper 3D | 160.8 | 107.1 | | Need for Speed No Limits | 140.7 | 87.7 | | Mortal Kombat X | 130.7 | 70.6 | | CSR Racing 2 | 140.7 | 58.4 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 240 MP | 128 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 48 MP | 48 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 60 | | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9 | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Exynos Modem 5200 | Balong 5G | | Download speed | 14000 MBit/s. | 15000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 12000 MBit/s. | 14000 MBit/s. | | Navigation | Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, SBAS, NaVIC | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | No | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2000 is better: 23
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 9000E is better: 13
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets Exynos 2000 and Kirin 9000E, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Snapdragon 875 Vs Kirin 9000E
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Samsung Exynos 2100 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
|
