Samsung Exynos 2000 vs Apple A14 Bionic

Comparisons 11-03-2021

Well, which processor or chip is better? Full data of speed tests and benchmarks Samsung Exynos 2000 vs Apple A14 Bionic, comparison of GPUs Apple A14 Bionic and Mali-G78 MP10.

This performance comparison includes two processors: Exynos 2000 is octa-core (Cortex-X1) and A14 Bionic is gexa-core (Icestorm). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the processors, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.

From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as Geekbench, Neocore, WebXPRT 3, Vellamo, 3DMark, PassMark, PCMark, Quadrant, Octane V2, Mozilla Kraken, GFXBench, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3, Mortal Kombat, Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc.

After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy Exynos 2000 or A14 Bionic and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Exynos 2000

97%

A14 Bionic

96%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Exynos 2000

93%

A14 Bionic

92%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Exynos 2000

90%

A14 Bionic

90%

Antutu 8

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Exynos 2000	A14 Bionic
Total score	645405	571583
CPU	180721	160050
GPU	245243	217206
MEM	103264	91462
UX	116171	102894

GeekBench 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Exynos 2000	A14 Bionic
Single-Core	1268	1621
Multi-Core	4045	4180

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Exynos 2000	A14 Bionic
Frequency	2900 MHz	3000 MHz
Cores	8	6
Bit	64	64
Lithography	5 nm	5 nm
Transistors count		11800000 millions
Core configuration	2x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1 2x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	8x3 GHz Icestorm 4x1.8 GHz Firestorm
Power consumption (TDP)	9 W	6 W
Memory type	LPDDR5	LPDDR4X
Max. Memory	16 Gb	6 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	4266
Memory bandwidth	44	42.7
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	192 KB
L2 cache	1 MB
L3 cache	2 MB	8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8.4-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here A14 Bionic is 3% better than Exynos 2000 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Exynos 2000 has -2 more core than A14 Bionic. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G78 MP10	Apple A14 Bionic
GPU Frequency	700 MHz	3000 MHz
GFloPS	854	1480
# of Cores	24	4
# of Shader Units
Display	4096 x 2160 pixels	2732 x 2048 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	29.5	28.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	72.8	60.9
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	100.5	56.3
Call of Duty: Mobile	56.1	57.5
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	62.4	47.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	91.1	74.8
Real Racing 3	175.9	98.5
Sniper 3D	160.8	73.2
Need for Speed No Limits	140.7	67.6
Mortal Kombat X	130.7	73.2
CSR Racing 2	140.7	67.6

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	240 MP	12 MP
Dual Camera resolution	48 MP	12 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)		Apple ISP
Video Encoding FPS	120	960
Video Encoding resolution	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9	Dolby Vision, H.265 (HEVC), HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, H.264 (AVC), VP8, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Exynos Modem 5200	Snapdragon X60 5G
Download speed	14000 MBit/s.	7500 MBit/s.
Upload speed	12000 MBit/s.	3000 MBit/s.
Navigation	Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, SBAS, NaVIC	NavIC enabled, GNSS, NavIC, Dual frequency GNSS, GLONASS, Galileo, GPS, QZSS, SBAS, Beidou
NFC support	No	Yes
5G support	No	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2000 is better: 28
The number of parameters for which Apple A14 Bionic is better: 14
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets Exynos 2000 and A14 Bionic, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Exynos 2000 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile

• Exynos 2000 specs and review.

A14 Bionic SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile

• A14 Bionic specs and review.