Comparisons 11-03-2021
Well, which processor or chip is better? Full data of speed tests and benchmarks Samsung Exynos 2000 vs Apple A14 Bionic, comparison of GPUs Apple A14 Bionic and Mali-G78 MP10.
This performance comparison includes two processors: Exynos 2000 is octa-core (Cortex-X1) and A14 Bionic is gexa-core (Icestorm). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the processors, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as Geekbench, Neocore, WebXPRT 3, Vellamo, 3DMark, PassMark, PCMark, Quadrant, Octane V2, Mozilla Kraken, GFXBench, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3, Mortal Kombat, Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc.
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy Exynos 2000 or A14 Bionic and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Asphalt 9.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Exynos 2000 | 97% |
A14 Bionic | 96% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Exynos 2000 | 93% |
A14 Bionic | 92% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Exynos 2000 | 90% |
A14 Bionic | 90% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Exynos 2000 |
A14 Bionic | | Total score | 645405 | 571583 | | CPU | 194979 | 177628 | | GPU | 273165 | 207069 | | MEM | 106071 | 110157 | | UX | 98549 | 101843 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Exynos 2000 |
A14 Bionic | | Single-Core | 1268 | 1621 | | Multi-Core | 4045 | 4180 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Exynos 2000 |
A14 Bionic | | Frequency | 2900 MHz | 3000 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 6 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | | 11800000 millions | | Core configuration | 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1
2x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 8x3 GHz Icestorm
4x1.8 GHz Firestorm | | Power consumption (TDP) | 9 W | 6 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 6 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 4266 | | Memory bandwidth | 44 | 42.7 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 192 KB | | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | | L3 cache | 2 MB | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.4-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here A14 Bionic is 3% better than Exynos 2000 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Exynos 2000 has -2 more core than A14 Bionic. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G78 MP10 | Apple A14 Bionic | | GPU Frequency | 700 MHz | 3000 MHz | | GFloPS | 854 | 1480 | | # of Cores | 24 | 4 | | # of Shader Units | | | | Display | 4096 x 2160 pixels | 2732 x 2048 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | 29.5 | 28.8 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 72.8 | 60.9 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 100.5 | 56.3 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | 56.1 | 57.5 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 62.4 | 47.5 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 91.1 | 74.8 | | Real Racing 3 | 175.9 | 98.5 | | Sniper 3D | 160.8 | 73.2 | | Need for Speed No Limits | 140.7 | 67.6 | | Mortal Kombat X | 130.7 | 73.2 | | CSR Racing 2 | 140.7 | 67.6 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 240 MP | 12 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 48 MP | 12 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Apple ISP | | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 960 | | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9 | Dolby Vision, H.265 (HEVC), HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, H.264 (AVC), VP8, VP9 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Exynos Modem 5200 | Snapdragon X60 5G | | Download speed | 14000 MBit/s. | 7500 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 12000 MBit/s. | 3000 MBit/s. | | Navigation | Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, SBAS, NaVIC | Beidou, GPS, GLONASS, Galileo | | NFC support | No | Yes | | 5G support | No | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2000 is better: 26
The number of parameters for which Apple A14 Bionic is better: 16
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets Exynos 2000 and A14 Bionic, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• MediaTek Dimensity 8100 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Snapdragon 875 Vs A14 Bionic
• MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• MediaTek Dimensity 8100 Vs Apple A14 Bionic
|
