Comparisons 11-03-2021
Well, which processor or chip is better? Full comparison data of benchmarks Samsung Exynos 2000 vs HiSilicon Kirin 985, speed testing of GPUs Mali-G77 MP8 and Mali-G78 MP10.
This performance comparison includes two processors: Exynos 2000 is octa-core (Cortex-X1) and Kirin 985 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A76). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special testing software like 3DMark, Geekbench, GFXBench, AnTuTu, Vellamo, WebXPRT 3, PCMark, PassMark, Neocore, Octane V2, Mozilla Kraken, Quadrant, and how good the chips are in games PUBG, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat etc.
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processors is better to buy Exynos 2000 or Kirin 985 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Exynos 2000 | 97% |
Kirin 985 | 82% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Exynos 2000 | 93% |
Kirin 985 | 77% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Exynos 2000 | 90% |
Kirin 985 | 77% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Exynos 2000 |
Kirin 985 | | Total score | 645405 | 423580 | | CPU | 194979 | 134631 | | GPU | 273165 | 142013 | | MEM | 106071 | 79179 | | UX | 98549 | 67029 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Exynos 2000 |
Kirin 985 | | Single-Core | 1268 | 880 | | Multi-Core | 4045 | 2995 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Exynos 2000 |
Kirin 985 | | Frequency | 2900 MHz | 2580 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1
2x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 1x2.58 GHz ARM Cortex-A76
3x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A76
4x1.84 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 9 W | 6 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4x | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 12 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 1600 | | Memory bandwidth | 44 | 34.1 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 192 KB | | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | | L3 cache | 2 MB | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 2000 is 11% better than Kirin 985 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G78 MP10 | Mali-G77 MP8 | | GPU Frequency | 700 MHz | 800 MHz | | GFloPS | 854 | 628 | | # of Cores | 24 | 8 | | # of Shader Units | | | | Display | 4096 x 2160 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | 29.5 | 27.6 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 72.8 | 54.1 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 100.5 | 56.2 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | 56.1 | 41.2 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 62.4 | 45.6 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 91.1 | 75.1 | | Real Racing 3 | 175.9 | 98.4 | | Sniper 3D | 160.8 | 106.8 | | Need for Speed No Limits | 140.7 | 89.9 | | Mortal Kombat X | 130.7 | 73.1 | | CSR Racing 2 | 140.7 | 73.1 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 240 MP | 32 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 48 MP | | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 60 | | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9 | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Exynos Modem 5200 | 21 | | Download speed | 14000 MBit/s. | 1277 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 12000 MBit/s. | 175 MBit/s. | | Navigation | Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, SBAS, NaVIC | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | No | No | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2000 is better: 37
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 985 is better: 2
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Snapdragon 875 Vs Kirin 985
• Apple A12Z Bionic Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• HiSilicon Kirin 9000 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• HiSilicon Kirin 9000E Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Samsung Exynos 1080 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
|
