Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 vs Samsung Exynos 2000

Comparisons 03-12-2021

Comprehensive testing data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 vs Samsung Exynos 2000, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as Vellamo, PassMark, Neocore, AnTuTu, Quadrant, PCMark, 3DMark, GFXBench, Geekbench, even the gaming performance of chips in GTA, Madout2, Call of Duty, PUBG, Fortnite, Minecraft, Asphalt 9 etc.
After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you already be able to understand which processors is better to buy Snapdragon 895 or Exynos 2000.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Snapdragon 895

65%

Exynos 2000

46%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Snapdragon 895

83%

Exynos 2000

79%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Snapdragon 895

62%

Exynos 2000

43%

Antutu 8

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Snapdragon 895	Exynos 2000
Total score	913355	645405
CPU	255748	180721
GPU	347074	245243
MEM	146131	103264
UX	164393	116171

GeekBench 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Snapdragon 895	Exynos 2000
Single-Core	1274	1268
Multi-Core	4016	4045

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Snapdragon 895	Exynos 2000
Frequency	2900 MHz	2900 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	4 nm	5 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	1x2.9 GHz Cortex-X2 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510	2x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1 2x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	6 W	9 W
Memory type	LPDDR5 (Quad Channel)	LPDDR5
Max. Memory	32 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	3200	2133
Memory bandwidth	88	44
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	1 MB	192 KB
L2 cache	2 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	8 MB	2 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Adreno 730	Mali-G78 MP10
GPU Frequency	970 MHz	700 MHz
GFloPS	1800	854
# of Cores		24
# of Shader Units	1024
Display	7680 x 4320 pixels	4096 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	34.2	29.5
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	108.5	72.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	63.8	100.5
Call of Duty: Mobile	59.1	56.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	92.5	62.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	133.9	91.1
Real Racing 3	129.8	175.9
Sniper 3D	143.5	160.8
Need for Speed No Limits	90.4	140.7
Mortal Kombat X	93.3	130.7
CSR Racing 2	78.8	140.7

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	240 MP
Dual Camera resolution	64 MP	48 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)	Qualcomm Spectra 680
Video Encoding FPS	120	120
Video Encoding resolution	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10	H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Qualcomm Snapdragon X65 Modem-RF System 5G	Exynos Modem 5200
Download speed	10000 MBit/s.	14000 MBit/s.
Upload speed	3000 MBit/s.	12000 MBit/s.
Navigation	SBAS, NavIC, QZSS, Galileo, GPS, GLONASS, Dual frequency GNSS, NavIC enabled, Beidou, GNSS	Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, SBAS, NaVIC
NFC support	Yes	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 is better: 27
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2000 is better: 12
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Snapdragon 895 SoC - all data

• PUBG mobile
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile

• Snapdragon 895 specs and review.

Exynos 2000 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile

• Exynos 2000 specs and review.