Comparisons 03-12-2021
Comprehensive testing data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 vs Samsung Exynos 2000, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as Vellamo, PassMark, Neocore, AnTuTu, Quadrant, PCMark, 3DMark, GFXBench, Geekbench, even the gaming performance of chips in GTA, Madout2, Call of Duty, PUBG, Fortnite, Minecraft, Asphalt 9 etc.
After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you already be able to understand which processors is better to buy Snapdragon 895 or Exynos 2000.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Snapdragon 895 | 99% |
Exynos 2000 | 97% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Snapdragon 895 | 84% |
Exynos 2000 | 93% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Snapdragon 895 | 94% |
Exynos 2000 | 90% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 895 |
Exynos 2000 | | Total score | 913355 | 645405 | | CPU | 268491 | 194979 | | GPU | 334895 | 273165 | | MEM | 153388 | 106071 | | UX | 139755 | 98549 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 895 |
Exynos 2000 | | Single-Core | 1274 | 1268 | | Multi-Core | 4016 | 4045 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 895 |
Exynos 2000 | | Frequency | 2900 MHz | 2900 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 1x2.9 GHz Cortex-X2
3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710
2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510 | 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1
2x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 9 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | LPDDR5 | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 2133 | | Memory bandwidth | 88 | 44 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 1 MB | 192 KB | | L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 2 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G78 MP10 | | GPU Frequency | 970 MHz | 700 MHz | | GFloPS | 1800 | 854 | | # of Cores | | 24 | | # of Shader Units | 1024 | | | Display | 7680 x 4320 pixels | 4096 x 2160 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 29.5 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 72.8 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 100.5 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 56.1 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 62.4 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 91.1 | | Real Racing 3 | | 175.9 | | Sniper 3D | | 160.8 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 140.7 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 130.7 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 140.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 200 MP | 240 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 48 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 680 | | | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 120 | | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X65 Modem-RF System 5G | Exynos Modem 5200 | | Download speed | 10000 MBit/s. | 14000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 3000 MBit/s. | 12000 MBit/s. | | Navigation | SBAS, NavIC, QZSS, Galileo, GPS, GLONASS, Dual frequency GNSS, NavIC enabled, Beidou, GNSS | Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, SBAS, NaVIC | | NFC support | Yes | No | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 is better: 22
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2000 is better: 17
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
• PUBG mobile
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
|
