Comparisons 28-07-2022
Comprehensive compare data of MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max vs Samsung Exynos 2000, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Neocore, Vellamo, PCMark, GFXBench, 3DMark, Geekbench, AnTuTu, PassMark, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of processors in Fortnite, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Madout2, PUBG, GTA, Asphalt 9 etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to know which chip is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max or Exynos 2000.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max | 97% |
Exynos 2000 | 97% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max | 89% |
Exynos 2000 | 93% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max | 92% |
Exynos 2000 | 90% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max |
Exynos 2000 | | Total score | 801076 | 645405 | | CPU | 163368 | 194979 | | GPU | 139627 | 273165 | | MEM | 106600 | 106071 | | UX | 93142 | 98549 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max |
Exynos 2000 | | Single-Core | 1180 | 1268 | | Multi-Core | 4137 | 4045 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max |
Exynos 2000 | | Frequency | 2900 MHz | 2900 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 6200 millions | | | Core configuration | 4x2.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1
2x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 8 W | 9 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6400 | 2133 | | Memory bandwidth | 48 | 44 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 64 KB | 192 KB | | L2 cache | 640 KB | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 16 MB | 2 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G610 MP6 | Mali-G78 MP10 | | GPU Frequency | 600 MHz | 700 MHz | | GFloPS | 912 | 854 | | # of Cores | 6 | 24 | | # of Shader Units | | | | Display | 2560 x 1440 pixels | 4096 x 2160 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 29.5 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 72.8 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 100.5 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 56.1 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 62.4 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 91.1 | | Real Racing 3 | | 175.9 | | Sniper 3D | | 160.8 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 140.7 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 130.7 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 140.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 200 MP | 240 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 32 MP | 48 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 120 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Exynos Modem 5200 | | Download speed | 4700 MBit/s. | 14000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 12000 MBit/s. | | Navigation | BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, GPS L1CA+L5, Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1 + E5a, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5 | Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, SBAS, NaVIC | | NFC support | Yes | No | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max is better: 14
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2000 is better: 25
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
|
