 |
Qualcomm QCS6490 vs Qualcomm 205 |
|
Comparisons 18-02-2023 Comprehensive comparison data of Qualcomm QCS6490 vs Qualcomm 205, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like Neocore, GFXBench, PassMark, Geekbench, 3DMark, PCMark, Vellamo, Quadrant, AnTuTu, and how good the chips are in games Minecraft, Call of Duty, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Madout2, GTA etc. After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which chipset is better to buy QCS6490 or Qualcomm 205.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreQCS6490 | 42% |
Qualcomm 205 | 2% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)QCS6490 | 81% |
Qualcomm 205 | 30% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingQCS6490 | 40% |
Qualcomm 205 | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | QCS6490 |
Qualcomm 205 | Total score | 592145 | 35062 | CPU | 165802 | 9817 | GPU | 225011 | 13329 | MEM | 94749 | 5612 | UX | 106579 | 6311 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | QCS6490 |
Qualcomm 205 | Single-Core | 920 | 93 | Multi-Core | 3344 | 428 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | QCS6490 |
Qualcomm 205 | Frequency | 2700 MHz | 1100 MHz | Cores | 8 | 4 | Bit | 64 | 32 | Lithography | 6 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | 5200 millions | | Core configuration | 1x2.7 GHz Kryo 670 Gold Plus 3x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 Gold 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 670 Silver | 4x1.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 4 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR 2, LPDDR 3 | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 1 Gb | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 333 | Memory bandwidth | 16 | 6 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 512 KB | 128 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.3-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here QCS6490 is 59% better than Qualcomm 205 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that QCS6490 has -4 more core than Qualcomm 205. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 643L | Adreno 304 | GPU Frequency | 812 MHz | 400 MHz | GFloPS | 1573 | 19.2 | # of Cores | | | # of Shader Units | 576 | 24 | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 960 x 540 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 26.4 | 10.9 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 67.5 | 27.3 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 92.6 | 17.7 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 51.5 | 14.6 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 57.8 | 23.8 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 84.9 | 35.6 | Real Racing 3 | 115.8 | 22.1 | Sniper 3D | 148.5 | 33.6 | Need for Speed No Limits | 129.7 | 24.8 | Mortal Kombat X | 120.8 | 25.7 | CSR Racing 2 | 120.9 | 21.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 192 MP | 3 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 36 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 570L | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG, H.264 (AVC), H.265 (HEVC), VP8, VP9 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Modem QCM6490 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon X5 LTE modem | Download speed | 3700 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 1600 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | NavIC enabled, GBeidou, GLONASS, GPS, QZSS, Galileo | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm QCS6490 is better: 42
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm 205 is better: 2 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
QCS6490 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCM4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra
Qualcomm 205 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs MediaTek MT8167A • Vs MediaTek MT6731 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
| |
|