Samsung Exynos 2000 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888

Comparisons 11-03-2021

Well, which chip or processor is better? Comprehensive compare data of benchmarks Samsung Exynos 2000 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888, speed testing of GPUs Mali-G78 MP10 and Adreno 660.

This performance comparison includes two processors: Exynos 2000 is octa-core (Cortex-X1) and Snapdragon 888 is octa-core (Cortex-X1 3x2.42). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the chipsets, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.

From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special testing software like Octane V2, GFXBench, 3DMark, WebXPRT 3, Mozilla Kraken, Vellamo, GeekBench 6, 5, Neocore, PassMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu 8, PCMark, and how good the chipsets are in games PUBG, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite etc.

After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processors is better to buy Exynos 2000 or Snapdragon 888 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Exynos 2000

46%

Snapdragon 888

62%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Exynos 2000

79%

Snapdragon 888

79%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Exynos 2000

43%

Snapdragon 888

59%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Exynos 2000	Snapdragon 888
Total score	645405	863876
CPU	180721	241883
GPU	245243	328267
MEM	103264	138216
UX	116171	155506

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Exynos 2000	Snapdragon 888
Single-Core	1268	1169
Multi-Core	4045	3687

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Exynos 2000	Snapdragon 888
Frequency	2900 MHz	2840 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	5 nm	5 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1 2x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	9 W	10 W
Memory type	LPDDR5	LPDDR5 (Quad Channel)
Max. Memory	16 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	2750
Memory bandwidth	44	44
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	192 KB	512 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	2 MB	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 2000 is 2% better than Snapdragon 888 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G78 MP10	Adreno 660
GPU Frequency	700 MHz	700 MHz
GFloPS	854	1486
# of Cores	24
# of Shader Units		512
Display	4096 x 2160 pixels	3840 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	29.5	27.5
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	72.8	84.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	100.5	51.9
Call of Duty: Mobile	56.1	47.3
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	62.4	72.2
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	91.1	105.5
Real Racing 3	175.9	64.9
Sniper 3D	160.8	67.5
Need for Speed No Limits	140.7	72.7
Mortal Kombat X	130.7	75.3
CSR Racing 2	140.7	72.7

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	240 MP	200 MP
Dual Camera resolution	48 MP	64 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)		Qualcomm Spectra 580
Video Encoding FPS	120	60
Video Encoding resolution	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9	Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Exynos Modem 5200	Qualcomm Snapdragon X60 Modem-RF System 5G
Download speed	14000 MBit/s.	7500 MBit/s.
Upload speed	12000 MBit/s.	3000 MBit/s.
Navigation	Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, SBAS, NaVIC	GNSS, QZSS, GLONASS, SBAS, GPS, NavIC, NavIC enabled, Beidou, Galileo, Dual frequency GNSS
NFC support	No	Yes
5G support	No	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2000 is better: 18
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 is better: 17
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets Exynos 2000 and Snapdragon 888, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Exynos 2000 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 2000 specs and review.

Snapdragon 888 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Snapdragon 888 specs and review.