Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Qualcomm QCS6490 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max benchmark which processor is better

Qualcomm QCS6490 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max

Comparisons   18-02-2023
   Comprehensive compare data of Qualcomm QCS6490 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as GFXBench, Quadrant, AnTuTu, PassMark, Neocore, 3DMark, Geekbench, Vellamo, PCMark, even the gaming performance of processors in Asphalt 9, Fortnite, PUBG, GTA, Call of Duty, Minecraft, Madout2 etc.
   After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy QCS6490 or MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max.

 
Qualcomm QCS6490
MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
QCS649042% MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max57%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
QCS649081% MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max83%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
QCS649040% MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max56%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
QCS6490 MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
Total score592145793065
CPU165802222056
GPU225011301360
MEM94749126886
UX106579142757

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
QCS6490 MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
Single-Core9201168
Multi-Core33444095

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
QCS6490 MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
Frequency2700 MHz2800 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography6 nm5 nm
Transistors count5200 millions6200 millions
Core configuration1x2.7 GHz Kryo 670 Gold Plus
3x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 Gold
4x1.9 GHz Kryo 670 Silver
4x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)5 W8 W
Memory typeLPDDR5LPDDR5
Max. Memory16 Gb32 Gb
Memory Frequency32006400
Memory bandwidth1648
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache512 KB64 KB
L2 cache1 MB640 KB
L3 cache2 MB16 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8.3-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max is 3% better than QCS6490 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUAdreno 643LMali-G610 MP6
GPU Frequency812 MHz600 MHz
GFloPS1573912
# of Cores6
# of Shader Units576
Display2520 x 1080 pixels2560 x 1440 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile26.431.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)67.594.3
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra92.655.9
Call of Duty: Mobile51.552.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)57.880.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition84.9115.8
Real Racing 3115.8113.4
Sniper 3D148.5123.8
Need for Speed No Limits129.778.2
Mortal Kombat X120.881.1
CSR Racing 2120.967.3
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution192 MP200 MP
Dual Camera resolution36 MP32 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)Qualcomm Spectra 570L
Video Encoding FPS60240
Video Encoding resolution4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec supportHDR10+, HDR10, HLG, H.264 (AVC), H.265 (HEVC), VP8, VP9H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1


Networks and Navigation
ModemModem QCM6490 5GSub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode
Download speed3700 MBit/s.4700 MBit/s.
Upload speed1600 MBit/s.2500 MBit/s.
NavigationNavIC enabled, GBeidou, GLONASS, GPS, QZSS, GalileoQZSS L1CA+ L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, Glonass L1OF, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC
NFC supportYesYes
5G supportYesYes


Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm QCS6490 is better: 13
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max is better: 27
   You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
QCS6490 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


QCS6490 SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs Qualcomm QCM6490
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm QCS7230
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Qualcomm QCS8250
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs Google Tensor
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs Apple A15 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
• Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
• Vs Apple A13 Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Vs Apple A12 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1280
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs Qualcomm 215
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
• Vs Qualcomm QCM4290
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Google Tensor G2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Apple A16 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9825
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A
• Vs Unisoc SC9832E
• Vs Rockchip RK3566
• Vs MediaTek MT8768T
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula
• Vs MediaTek Helio G96
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3


MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max SoC Comparisons
• Vs Google Tensor
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
• Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
• Vs Apple A13 Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs Apple A16 Bionic
• Vs Apple A15 Bionic
• MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max Vs Google Tensor G2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Vs Apple A12 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1280
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G99
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9825
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Qualcomm QCM6490
• Vs Qualcomm QCS8250
• Vs Qualcomm QCS7230
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
• Vs MediaTek MT8188J
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
• Vs Google Tensor G3
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands