Qualcomm QCS6490 vs MediaTek MT8768T

Comparisons 18-02-2023

Comprehensive testing data of Qualcomm QCS6490 vs MediaTek MT8768T, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications of the CPUs, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Quadrant, 3DMark, PassMark, Neocore, PCMark, GFXBench, Geekbench, Vellamo, AnTuTu, and how good the chipsets are in games Madout2, Minecraft, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, GTA, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to know which processors is better to buy QCS6490 or MT8768T.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

QCS6490

42%

MT8768T

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

QCS6490

81%

MT8768T

34%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

QCS6490

40%

MT8768T

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	QCS6490	MT8768T
Total score	592145	93268
CPU	165802	26105
GPU	225011	35434
MEM	94749	14916
UX	106579	16782

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	QCS6490	MT8768T
Single-Core	920	241
Multi-Core	3344	1086

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	QCS6490	MT8768T
Frequency	2700 MHz	2300 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	6 nm	28 nm
Transistors count	5200 millions
Core configuration	1x2.7 GHz Kryo 670 Gold Plus 3x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 Gold 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 670 Silver	4x2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR5	LPDDR3 (Single Channel)
Max. Memory	16 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	3200	800
Memory bandwidth	16	14
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	512 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	2 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.3-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here QCS6490 is 14% better than MT8768T in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Adreno 643L	PowerVR GE8320
GPU Frequency	812 MHz	650 MHz
GFloPS	1573	126.8
# of Cores		2
# of Shader Units	576
Display	2520 x 1080 pixels	2400 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	26.4
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	67.5	18.9
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	92.6	33.7
Call of Duty: Mobile	51.5	20.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	57.8	15.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	84.9	19.8
Real Racing 3	115.8	42.1
Sniper 3D	148.5	74.1
Need for Speed No Limits	129.7	40.4
Mortal Kombat X	120.8	38.8
CSR Racing 2	120.9	43.8

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	192 MP	25 MP
Dual Camera resolution	36 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)	Qualcomm Spectra 570L
Video Encoding FPS	60	30
Video Encoding resolution	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	HDR10+, HDR10, HLG, H.264 (AVC), H.265 (HEVC), VP8, VP9	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Modem QCM6490 5G
Download speed	3700 MBit/s.	300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	1600 MBit/s.	100 MBit/s.
Navigation	NavIC enabled, GBeidou, GLONASS, GPS, QZSS, Galileo	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	Yes	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm QCS6490 is better: 39
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8768T is better: 1
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

QCS6490 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• QCS6490 specs and review.

MT8768T SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• MT8768T specs and review.