MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs Samsung Exynos 2000

Comparisons 11-03-2021

So, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive compare data of benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs Samsung Exynos 2000, speed testing of GPUs Mali-G78 MP10 and Mali-G77 MC9.

This performance comparison involves two processors: Dimensity 1200 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A78) and Exynos 2000 is octa-core (Cortex-X1). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.

From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests like GFXBench, Octane V2, PCMark, Mozilla Kraken, 3DMark, WebXPRT 3, Geekbench, Neocore, Vellamo, AnTuTu 8, PassMark, Quadrant, and how good the SoCs are in games Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, PUBG, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3 etc.

After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy Dimensity 1200 or Exynos 2000 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Dimensity 1200

45%

Exynos 2000

46%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Dimensity 1200

78%

Exynos 2000

79%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Dimensity 1200

42%

Exynos 2000

43%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Dimensity 1200	Exynos 2000
Total score	634362	645405
CPU	177612	180721
GPU	241052	245243
MEM	101498	103264
UX	114189	116171

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Dimensity 1200	Exynos 2000
Single-Core	1349	1268
Multi-Core	4187	4045

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Dimensity 1200	Exynos 2000
Frequency	3000 MHz	2900 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	6 nm	5 nm
Transistors count	5800 millions
Core configuration	1x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 3x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	2x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1 2x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	10 W	9 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x	LPDDR5
Max. Memory	16 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	4266	2133
Memory bandwidth	29	44
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	32 KB	192 KB
L2 cache	320 KB	1 MB
L3 cache	8 MB	2 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Dimensity 1200 is 3% better than Exynos 2000 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G77 MC9	Mali-G78 MP10
GPU Frequency	800 MHz	700 MHz
GFloPS	504	854
# of Cores	9	24
# of Shader Units
Display	2520 x 1080 pixels	4096 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	28.8	29.5
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	71.4	72.8
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	98.5	100.5
Call of Duty: Mobile	55.5	56.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	61.6	62.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	89.5	91.1
Real Racing 3	197	175.9
Sniper 3D	216.7	160.8
Need for Speed No Limits	157.6	140.7
Mortal Kombat X	157.6	130.7
CSR Racing 2	137.9	140.7

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	240 MP
Dual Camera resolution	32 MP	48 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	120
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	Exynos Modem 5200
Download speed	4700 MBit/s.	14000 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2500 MBit/s.	12000 MBit/s.
Navigation	Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, Glonass L1OF, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a	Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, SBAS, NaVIC
NFC support	Yes	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 1200 is better: 16
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 2000 is better: 25
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets Dimensity 1200 and Exynos 2000, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Dimensity 1200 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Dimensity 1200 specs and review.

Exynos 2000 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 2000 specs and review.